BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24781819)

  • 1. Perceptions of others' political affiliation are moderated by individual perceivers' own political attitudes.
    Wilson JP; Rule NO
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95431. PubMed ID: 24781819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces.
    Rule NO; Ambady N
    PLoS One; 2010 Jan; 5(1):e8733. PubMed ID: 20090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans.
    Moore-Berg SL; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Hameiri B; Bruneau E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):14864-14872. PubMed ID: 32527858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Political Ideology and Stigmatizing Attitudes Toward Depression: The Swedish Case.
    Löve J; Bertilsson M; Martinsson J; Wängnerud L; Hensing G
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2019 Jun; 8(6):365-374. PubMed ID: 31256568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of stereotypes and individuating information in political person perception.
    Crawford JT; Jussim L; Madon S; Cain TR; Stevens ST
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Apr; 37(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 21343439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Everyday Perceiver-Context Influences on Impression Formation: No Evidence of Consistent Effects.
    Xie SY; Thai S; Hehman E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jun; 49(6):955-968. PubMed ID: 35471126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Democrats and independents stigmatize people with COVID-19 greater compared to Republicans.
    Monheim CL; Himmelstein MS
    J Soc Psychol; 2023 Mar; 163(2):158-173. PubMed ID: 36416240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judging political affiliation from faces of UK MPs.
    Roberts T; Griffin H; McOwan PW; Johnston A
    Perception; 2011; 40(8):949-52. PubMed ID: 22132509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proprioception and person perception: politicians and professors.
    Slepian ML; Rule NO; Ambady N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1621-8. PubMed ID: 22956292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes toward legalization of marijuana in the United States, 1986-2016: Changes in determinants of public opinion.
    Denham BE
    Int J Drug Policy; 2019 Sep; 71():78-90. PubMed ID: 31238179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments.
    Lick DJ; Johnson KL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 110(6):801-17. PubMed ID: 27281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Multiple-Matching Perspective on Value Versus Identity: Investigating How Political Ideology and Party Identity Contribute to Citizens' Support for Political Candidates.
    Bai H
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jan; 50(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 36113113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Political differences in past, present, and future life satisfaction: Republicans are more sensitive than democrats to political climate.
    Mandel DR; Omorogbe P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98854. PubMed ID: 24901253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial Impressions Are Predicted by the Structure of Group Stereotypes.
    Xie SY; Flake JK; Stolier RM; Freeman JB; Hehman E
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1979-1993. PubMed ID: 34825594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.
    Stern C; West TV; Jost JT; Rule NO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):520-41. PubMed ID: 23276275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity.
    Rosenblum M; Schroeder J; Gino F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Jul; 119(1):75-103. PubMed ID: 31414870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influencing Republicans' and Democrats' attitudes toward Obamacare: Effects of imagined vicarious cognitive dissonance on political attitudes.
    Cooper J; Feldman LA; Blackman SF
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 29659334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social cues and ideology.
    Mansell J
    Politics Life Sci; 2018; 37(1):32-52. PubMed ID: 29717958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epistemic spillovers: Learning others' political views reduces the ability to assess and use their expertise in nonpolitical domains.
    Marks J; Copland E; Loh E; Sunstein CR; Sharot T
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():74-84. PubMed ID: 30342868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.