These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24782203)

  • 1. Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.
    DeLeon IG; Chase JA; Frank-Crawford MA; Carreau-Webster AB; Triggs MM; Bullock CE; Jennett HK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 24782203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating Preference and Performance in Accumulated versus Distributed Response-Reinforcer Arrangements.
    Weston R; Davis T; Ross RK
    Behav Modif; 2020 Nov; 44(6):909-926. PubMed ID: 31387363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accumulated reinforcers increase academic responding and suppress problem behavior for students with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Robinson N; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Oct; 52(4):1076-1088. PubMed ID: 31016731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accumulated and distributed response-reinforcer arrangements during the treatment of escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Frank-Crawford MA; Borrero JC; Newcomb ET; Doan T; Fisher A; Rooker GW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Sep; 54(4):1566-1585. PubMed ID: 34341998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the reinforcing efficacy of tokens and primary reinforcers.
    Bonfonte SA; Bourret JC; Lloveras LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 31930500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of reinforcer magnitude and distribution on preference for work schedules.
    Ward-Horner JC; Pittenger A; Pace G; Fienup DM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):623-7. PubMed ID: 24825241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A preference analysis of reinforcer variation and choice.
    Hanratty LA; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):1062-1074. PubMed ID: 33990131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
    Leon Y; Borrero JC; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of accumulated and distributed reinforcement periods with children exhibiting escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Fulton CJ; Tiger JH; Meitzen HM; Effertz HM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Apr; 53(2):782-795. PubMed ID: 31414480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the value of choice in a token system.
    Sran SK; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(3):553-7. PubMed ID: 21358919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating different values of effort and reinforcement parameters under concurrent- and single-operant arrangements.
    Lozy ED; Sy JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):516-533. PubMed ID: 30548587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.
    Lalli JS; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
    Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.
    Hanley GP; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Contrucci SA; Maglieri KA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):459-73. PubMed ID: 9316259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of synchronous reinforcement for increasing on-task behavior in preschool children.
    Diaz de Villegas SC; Dozier CL; Jess RL; Foley EA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1660-1673. PubMed ID: 32130735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Token reinforcement, choice, and self-control in pigeons.
    Jackson K; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jul; 66(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 8755699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the generality of children's preference for contingent reinforcement via extension to different responses, reinforcers, and schedules.
    Luczynski KC; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(3):397-409. PubMed ID: 21358901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.