These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24782538)

  • 1. Phenotypic switching in gene regulatory networks.
    Thomas P; Popović N; Grima R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 May; 111(19):6994-9. PubMed ID: 24782538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stochastic modeling and numerical simulation of gene regulatory networks with protein bursting.
    Pájaro M; Alonso AA; Otero-Muras I; Vázquez C
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 421():51-70. PubMed ID: 28341132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinguishing the rates of gene activation from phenotypic variations.
    Chen Y; Lv C; Li F; Li T
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015 Jun; 9():29. PubMed ID: 26084378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revisiting the Reduction of Stochastic Models of Genetic Feedback Loops with Fast Promoter Switching.
    Holehouse J; Grima R
    Biophys J; 2019 Oct; 117(7):1311-1330. PubMed ID: 31540707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-modality in gene regulatory networks with slow promoter kinetics.
    Ali Al-Radhawi M; Del Vecchio D; Sontag ED
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Feb; 15(2):e1006784. PubMed ID: 30779734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relatively slow stochastic gene-state switching in the presence of positive feedback significantly broadens the region of bimodality through stabilizing the uninduced phenotypic state.
    Ge H; Wu P; Qian H; Xie XS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Mar; 14(3):e1006051. PubMed ID: 29529037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distributions for negative-feedback-regulated stochastic gene expression: dimension reduction and numerical solution of the chemical master equation.
    Zeron ES; Santillán M
    J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 20144620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linear mapping approximation of gene regulatory networks with stochastic dynamics.
    Cao Z; Grima R
    Nat Commun; 2018 Aug; 9(1):3305. PubMed ID: 30120244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feedback between stochastic gene networks and population dynamics enables cellular decision-making.
    Piho P; Thomas P
    Sci Adv; 2024 May; 10(21):eadl4895. PubMed ID: 38787956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise Control in Gene Regulatory Networks with Negative Feedback.
    Hinczewski M; Thirumalai D
    J Phys Chem B; 2016 Jul; 120(26):6166-77. PubMed ID: 27095600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Type of noise defines global attractors in bistable molecular regulatory systems.
    Jaruszewicz J; Zuk PJ; Lipniacki T
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Jan; 317():140-51. PubMed ID: 23063780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stochastic phenotype transition of a single cell in an intermediate region of gene state switching.
    Ge H; Qian H; Xie XS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Feb; 114(7):078101. PubMed ID: 25763973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interplay between stochasticity and negative feedback leads to pulsed dynamics and distinct gene activity patterns.
    Zambrano S; Bianchi ME; Agresti A; Molina N
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Aug; 92(2):022711. PubMed ID: 26382436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
    Thomas P; Matuschek H; Grima R
    BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S5. PubMed ID: 24266939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the spontaneous stochastic dynamics of a single gene: complexity of the molecular interplay at the promoter.
    Coulon A; Gandrillon O; Beslon G
    BMC Syst Biol; 2010 Jan; 4():2. PubMed ID: 20064204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastic switching of delayed feedback suppresses oscillations in genetic regulatory systems.
    Karamched BR; Miles CE
    J R Soc Interface; 2023 Jun; 20(203):20230059. PubMed ID: 37376870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple negative interaction in the positive transcriptional feedback of a single gene is sufficient to produce reliable oscillations.
    Miró-Bueno JM; Rodríguez-Patón A
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27414. PubMed ID: 22205920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the impact of discreteness and abstractions on modelling noise in gene regulatory networks.
    Bodei C; Bortolussi L; Chiarugi D; Guerriero ML; Policriti A; Romanel A
    Comput Biol Chem; 2015 Jun; 56():98-108. PubMed ID: 25909953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stationary moments, distribution conjugation and phenotypic regions in stochastic gene transcription.
    Zhang JJ; Zhou TS
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Jul; 16(5):6134-6166. PubMed ID: 31499756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stochastic simulation algorithm for gene regulatory networks with multiple binding sites.
    Petroni M; Zimic N; Mraz M; Moškon M
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 25000485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.