These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24783088)

  • 1. i-gel™ in Ambulatory Surgery: A Comparison with LMA-ProSeal™ in Paralyzed Anaesthetized Patients.
    Das A; Majumdar S; Mukherjee A; Mitra T; Kundu R; Hajra BK; Mukherjee D; Das B
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Mar; 8(3):80-4. PubMed ID: 24783088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bhattacharjee S; Som A; Maitra S
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 Sep; 41():5-10. PubMed ID: 28802606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised controlled trial comparing ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, i-gel and Laryngeal Tube Suction-D under general anaesthesia for elective surgical patients requiring controlled ventilation.
    Das B; Varshney R; Mitra S
    Indian J Anaesth; 2017 Dec; 61(12):972-977. PubMed ID: 29307902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Success and Ease of Insertion of ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway versus I-gel™ Insertion by Paramedics in Simulated Difficult Airway Using Cervical Collar in Different Positions in Manikins.
    Gupta A; Kabi A; Gaur D
    Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(4):627-631. PubMed ID: 34349332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Size 2.5 i-gel™ with Proseal LMA™ in Anaesthetised, Paralyzed Children Undergoing Elective Surgery.
    Mitra S; Das B; Jamil SN
    N Am J Med Sci; 2012 Oct; 4(10):453-7. PubMed ID: 23112965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
    Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of I-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in patients: A meta-analysis.
    Tan Y; Jiang J; Wang R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278871. PubMed ID: 36520843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.
    Goyal R; Shukla RN; Kumar G
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 22151106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.
    Saran S; Mishra SK; Badhe AS; Vasudevan A; Elakkumanan LB; Mishra G
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 24803756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
    Mishra SK; Sivaraman B; Balachander H; Naggappa M; Parida S; Bhat RR; Yuvaraj K
    Anesth Essays Res; 2015; 9(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 26712973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Chang JE; Kim H; Lee JM; Min SW; Won D; Jun K; Hwang JY
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients.
    Joly N; Poulin LP; Tanoubi I; Drolet P; Donati F; St-Pierre P
    Can J Anaesth; 2014 Sep; 61(9):794-800. PubMed ID: 25141831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients.
    Nirupa R; Gombar S; Ahuja V; Sharma P
    Indian J Anaesth; 2016 Oct; 60(10):726-731. PubMed ID: 27761035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Haemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery.
    Peker G; Takmaz SA; Baltacı B; Başar H; Kotanoğlu M
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2015 Oct; 43(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 27366519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Abdellatif AA; Ali MA
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 5(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 21957405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of clinical performance of size 1.5 Supreme™ LMA and Proseal™ LMA among Asian children: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chaw SH; Shariffuddin II; Foo LL; Lee PK; Paran RM; Cheang PC; Chan L
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 29404890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized comparative study of three supraglottic airway devices for controlled ventilation in anesthetized patients.
    Sharma M; Sharma B; Gupta M; Panday BC; Sahai C; Sood J
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2022; 38(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 36171925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.
    Oba S; Turk HS; Isil CT; Erdogan H; Sayin P; Dokucu AI
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal and Ambu AuraGain in adult patients under controlled ventilation: A randomised study.
    Salhotra R; Padhy A; Rautela RS; Singh D
    Indian J Anaesth; 2023 May; 67(5):426-431. PubMed ID: 37333703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal.
    Chauhan G; Nayar P; Seth A; Gupta K; Panwar M; Agrawal N
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 29(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23493414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.