These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24783248)

  • 1. Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on the adequacy of endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Matynia AP; Schmidt RL; Barraza G; Layfield LJ; Siddiqui AA; Adler DG
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 24783248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions.
    Schmidt RL; Witt BL; Matynia AP; Barraza G; Layfield LJ; Adler DG
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(3):872-82. PubMed ID: 23053888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic ultrasound core needle for diagnosing of solid pancreatic lesions: is rapid on-site evaluation really necessary?
    Arena M; Eusebi LH; Pellicano R; Palamara MA; Iabichino G; Consolo P; Fagoonee S; Opocher E; Barabino M; Luigiano C
    Minerva Med; 2017 Dec; 108(6):547-553. PubMed ID: 28750500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique: A single-centre experience.
    Milluzzo SM; Olivari N; Rossi G; Bianchi D; Liserre B; Graffeo M; Lovera M; Correale L; Hassan C; Spada C
    Cytopathology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 37186418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis.
    Schmidt RL; Walker BS; Howard K; Layfield LJ; Adler DG
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(11):3280-6. PubMed ID: 23824404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment.
    Khan MA; Grimm IS; Ali B; Nollan R; Tombazzi C; Ismail MK; Baron TH
    Endosc Int Open; 2017 May; 5(5):E363-E375. PubMed ID: 28497108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.
    Haba S; Yamao K; Bhatia V; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Niwa Y; Tajika M; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Shimizu Y; Yatabe Y; Hosoda W; Kawakami H; Sakamoto N
    J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 23090002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions.
    Uehara H; Sueyoshi H; Takada R; Fukutake N; Katayama K; Ashida R; Ioka T; Takenaka A; Nagata S; Tomita Y
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25979252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographer of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nebel JA; Soldan M; Dumonceau JM; de Souza Carvalho CE; Chagas VLA; de Assis PG; Lapa E Silva JR; Rezende GFDM
    Pancreas; 2021 Jul; 50(6):815-821. PubMed ID: 34347723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid On-Site Evaluation Does Not Improve Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Adequacy in Pancreatic Masses: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Kong F; Zhu J; Kong X; Sun T; Deng X; Du Y; Li Z
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163056. PubMed ID: 27657529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of visual on-site evaluation (Vose) In predicting the adequacy of Eus-guided fine needle biopsy: A single center prospective study.
    Stigliano S; Balassone V; Biasutto D; Covotta F; Signoretti M; Di Matteo FM
    Pancreatology; 2021 Jan; 21(1):312-317. PubMed ID: 33358086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li H; Li W; Zhou QY; Fan B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(13):e0207. PubMed ID: 29595661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
    Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Telecytopathology for on-site adequacy evaluation decreases the nondiagnostic rate in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions.
    Khurana KK; Graber B; Wang D; Roy A
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Sep; 20(9):822-7. PubMed ID: 25093731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound imaging and the number of needle passages are significant factors predicting high yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses without an on-site cytopathologist.
    Jeong SH; Yoon HH; Kim EJ; Kim YJ; Kim YS; Cho JH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(2):e5782. PubMed ID: 28079803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.