174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24783252)
1. Clinical factors associated with accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic or peripancreatic solid mass without on-site cytopathologists.
Kim J; Ryu JK; Park JM; Paik WH; Song BJ; Kim YT; Yoon YB
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 24783252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of Malignancies in Patients with Inconclusive or Negative Results of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Masses.
Jeong H; Park CS; Kim KB; Han JH; Yoon SM; Chae HB; Youn SJ; Park SM
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2018 Mar; 71(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29566476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound imaging and the number of needle passages are significant factors predicting high yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses without an on-site cytopathologist.
Jeong SH; Yoon HH; Kim EJ; Kim YJ; Kim YS; Cho JH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(2):e5782. PubMed ID: 28079803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.
Iglesias-Garcia J; Dominguez-Munoz JE; Abdulkader I; Larino-Noia J; Eugenyeva E; Lozano-Leon A; Forteza-Vila J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Sep; 106(9):1705-10. PubMed ID: 21483464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: a single center experience in Korea.
Hwang CY; Lee SS; Song TJ; Moon SH; Lee D; Park DH; Seo DW; Lee SK; Kim MH
Gut Liver; 2009 Jun; 3(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 20431733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.
Haba S; Yamao K; Bhatia V; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Niwa Y; Tajika M; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Shimizu Y; Yatabe Y; Hosoda W; Kawakami H; Sakamoto N
J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 23090002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.
Mohamadnejad M; Mullady D; Early DS; Collins B; Marshall C; Sams S; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Nawaz S; Ulusarac O; Hollander T; Wilson RH; Simon VC; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Brauer BC; Gaddam S; Azar RR; Komanduri S; Shah R; Das A; Edmundowicz S; Muthusamy VR; Rastogi A; Wani S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):1071-1078.e2. PubMed ID: 28025154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Hébert-Magee S; Bae S; Varadarajulu S; Ramesh J; Frost AR; Eloubeidi MA; Eltoum IA
Cytopathology; 2013 Jun; 24(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 23711182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Differentiation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor From Other Neoplastic Solid Pancreatic Lesions During Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.
Krishna SG; Bhattacharya A; Li F; Ross WA; Ladha H; Porter K; Atiq M; Bhutani MS; Lee JH
Pancreas; 2016 Mar; 45(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 26418912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions.
Uehara H; Sueyoshi H; Takada R; Fukutake N; Katayama K; Ashida R; Ioka T; Takenaka A; Nagata S; Tomita Y
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25979252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions.
Mehmood S; Jahan A; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 43(4):278-86. PubMed ID: 25088987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter, prospective, crossover trial comparing the door-knocking method with the conventional method for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses (with videos).
Mukai S; Itoi T; Ashida R; Tsuchiya T; Ikeuchi N; Kamada K; Tanaka R; Umeda J; Tonozuka R; Fukutake N; Hoshi K; Moriyasu F; Gotoda T; Irisawa A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1210-7. PubMed ID: 26522372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis.
Varadarajulu S; Tamhane A; Eloubeidi MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Nov; 62(5):728-36; quiz 751, 753. PubMed ID: 16246688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Per-Pass Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Malignant Solid Pancreatic Masses in a Large Multicenter Cohort.
Ge PS; Wani S; Watson RR; Sedarat A; Kim S; Marshall C; Wilson RH; Makker J; Mohamadnejad M; Komanduri S; Muthusamy VR
Pancreas; 2018 Mar; 47(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 29401169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: is onsite cytopathology necessary?
Cherian PT; Mohan P; Douiri A; Taniere P; Hejmadi RK; Mahon BS
HPB (Oxford); 2010 Aug; 12(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 20662789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of K-ras gene mutation analysis in EUS-guided FNA cytology specimens for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Fuccio L; Hassan C; Laterza L; Correale L; Pagano N; Bocus P; Fabbri C; Maimone A; Cennamo V; Repici A; Costamagna G; Bazzoli F; Larghi A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 23660563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
