These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24783252)

  • 1. Clinical factors associated with accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic or peripancreatic solid mass without on-site cytopathologists.
    Kim J; Ryu JK; Park JM; Paik WH; Song BJ; Kim YT; Yoon YB
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 24783252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of Malignancies in Patients with Inconclusive or Negative Results of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Jeong H; Park CS; Kim KB; Han JH; Yoon SM; Chae HB; Youn SJ; Park SM
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2018 Mar; 71(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29566476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound imaging and the number of needle passages are significant factors predicting high yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses without an on-site cytopathologist.
    Jeong SH; Yoon HH; Kim EJ; Kim YJ; Kim YS; Cho JH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(2):e5782. PubMed ID: 28079803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.
    Iglesias-Garcia J; Dominguez-Munoz JE; Abdulkader I; Larino-Noia J; Eugenyeva E; Lozano-Leon A; Forteza-Vila J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Sep; 106(9):1705-10. PubMed ID: 21483464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: a single center experience in Korea.
    Hwang CY; Lee SS; Song TJ; Moon SH; Lee D; Park DH; Seo DW; Lee SK; Kim MH
    Gut Liver; 2009 Jun; 3(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 20431733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.
    Haba S; Yamao K; Bhatia V; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Niwa Y; Tajika M; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Shimizu Y; Yatabe Y; Hosoda W; Kawakami H; Sakamoto N
    J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 23090002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.
    Mohamadnejad M; Mullady D; Early DS; Collins B; Marshall C; Sams S; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Nawaz S; Ulusarac O; Hollander T; Wilson RH; Simon VC; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Brauer BC; Gaddam S; Azar RR; Komanduri S; Shah R; Das A; Edmundowicz S; Muthusamy VR; Rastogi A; Wani S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):1071-1078.e2. PubMed ID: 28025154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.
    Hébert-Magee S; Bae S; Varadarajulu S; Ramesh J; Frost AR; Eloubeidi MA; Eltoum IA
    Cytopathology; 2013 Jun; 24(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 23711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
    Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Differentiation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor From Other Neoplastic Solid Pancreatic Lesions During Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.
    Krishna SG; Bhattacharya A; Li F; Ross WA; Ladha H; Porter K; Atiq M; Bhutani MS; Lee JH
    Pancreas; 2016 Mar; 45(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 26418912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions.
    Uehara H; Sueyoshi H; Takada R; Fukutake N; Katayama K; Ashida R; Ioka T; Takenaka A; Nagata S; Tomita Y
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25979252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions.
    Mehmood S; Jahan A; Loya A; Yusuf MA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 43(4):278-86. PubMed ID: 25088987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter, prospective, crossover trial comparing the door-knocking method with the conventional method for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses (with videos).
    Mukai S; Itoi T; Ashida R; Tsuchiya T; Ikeuchi N; Kamada K; Tanaka R; Umeda J; Tonozuka R; Fukutake N; Hoshi K; Moriyasu F; Gotoda T; Irisawa A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1210-7. PubMed ID: 26522372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis.
    Varadarajulu S; Tamhane A; Eloubeidi MA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Nov; 62(5):728-36; quiz 751, 753. PubMed ID: 16246688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Per-Pass Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Malignant Solid Pancreatic Masses in a Large Multicenter Cohort.
    Ge PS; Wani S; Watson RR; Sedarat A; Kim S; Marshall C; Wilson RH; Makker J; Mohamadnejad M; Komanduri S; Muthusamy VR
    Pancreas; 2018 Mar; 47(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 29401169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
    Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: is onsite cytopathology necessary?
    Cherian PT; Mohan P; Douiri A; Taniere P; Hejmadi RK; Mahon BS
    HPB (Oxford); 2010 Aug; 12(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 20662789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of K-ras gene mutation analysis in EUS-guided FNA cytology specimens for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Fuccio L; Hassan C; Laterza L; Correale L; Pagano N; Bocus P; Fabbri C; Maimone A; Cennamo V; Repici A; Costamagna G; Bazzoli F; Larghi A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 23660563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.