These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24783880)

  • 41. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT.
    Chen X; Cuijpers V; Fan M; Frencken JE
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 20580767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: an in vitro study.
    Gunjal S; Nagesh L; Raju HG
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23059566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A field trial of resin-based and glass-ionomer fissure sealants: clinical and radiographic assessment of caries.
    Poulsen S; Laurberg L; Vaeth M; Jensen U; Haubek D
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 34(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 16423029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dental sealants guidelines development: 2002-2014.
    Crall JJ; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 25905651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Petrauskienė S; Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K; Narbutaitė J
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD; Hackenitz E
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9544860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.
    Uzel I; Gurlek C; Kuter B; Ertugrul F; Eden E
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():7205692. PubMed ID: 35769675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant.
    Beresescu L; Kovacs M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Benedek C; Pop M; Bungardean D; Eșian D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment-Sealed versus Nonsealed First Permanent Molars: A 3-Year Split-Mouth Clinical Trial.
    Hesse D; Guglielmi CAB; Raggio DP; Bönecker MJS; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC
    Caries Res; 2021; 55(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 33326970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature.
    Simonsen RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):393-414. PubMed ID: 12412954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Heat-treated glass ionomer cement fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow-up.
    Skrinjaric K; Vranic DN; Glavina D; Skrinjaric I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 18298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is preventing micro-cavities in dentine from progressing with a sealant successful?
    Zhang W; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Br Dent J; 2019 Apr; 226(8):590-594. PubMed ID: 31028327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    de Luca-Fraga LR; Pimenta LA
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Jun; 32(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 11491626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant.
    Raadal M; Utkilen AB; Nilsen OL
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Dec; 6(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 9161190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.
    de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):429-41. PubMed ID: 21274581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant.
    Poulsen S; Beiruti N; Sadat N
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2001 Aug; 29(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 11515644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
    Beauchamp J; Caufield PW; Crall JJ; Donly K; Feigal R; Gooch B; Ismail A; Kohn W; Siegal M; Simonsen R;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Mar; 139(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 18310730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe: evaluation after 1 year.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(6):428-33. PubMed ID: 8946101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Glass ionomer restorative cement systems: an update.
    Berg JH; Croll TP
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 25905652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) strategy in Mexico: two-years follow up of ART sealants and restorations.
    Luengas-Quintero E; Frencken JE; Muñúzuri-Hernández JA; Mulder J
    BMC Oral Health; 2013 Sep; 13():42. PubMed ID: 24010679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.