These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24784030)

  • 1. A moving-barber-pole illusion.
    Sun P; Chubb C; Sperling G
    J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):1. PubMed ID: 24784030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two mechanisms that determine the Barber-Pole Illusion.
    Sun P; Chubb C; Sperling G
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):43-54. PubMed ID: 25872181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cyclopean (stereoscopic) barber pole illusion.
    Patterson R; Bowd C; Donnelly M
    Vision Res; 1998 Jul; 38(14):2119-25. PubMed ID: 9797972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of one- and two-dimensional motion signals in infants: evidence from the barber-pole illusion.
    Dobkins KR; Lewis LB; Fine I
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3360-72. PubMed ID: 16854447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Directional shifts in the barber pole illusion: effects of spatial frequency, spatial adaptation, and lateral masking.
    Lalanne C; Lorenceau J
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(5):729-39. PubMed ID: 17020629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barber-pole illusions and plaids: the influence of aperture shape on motion perception.
    Mussap AJ; Crassini B
    Perception; 1993; 22(10):1155-74. PubMed ID: 8047406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of aperture surfaces on the barber-pole illusion.
    Mussap AJ; Te Grotenhuis K
    Perception; 1997; 26(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 9274750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The directional tuning of the barber-pole illusion.
    Fisher N; Zanker JM
    Perception; 2001; 30(11):1321-36. PubMed ID: 11768487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pigeons integrate visual motion signals differently than humans.
    Hataji Y; Kuroshima H; Fujita K
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13411. PubMed ID: 31527647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second-order motion shifts perceived position.
    Bressler DW; Whitney D
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1120-8. PubMed ID: 16359721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Global motion percept mediated through integration of barber poles presented in bilateral visual hemifields.
    Huang LT; Wong AM; Chen CP; Chang WH; Cheng JW; Lin YR; Pei YC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e74032. PubMed ID: 24009764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli.
    Castet E; Charton V; Dufour A
    Vision Res; 1999 Mar; 39(5):915-32. PubMed ID: 10341945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon.
    Lidén L; Mingolla E
    Vision Res; 1998 Dec; 38(24):3883-98. PubMed ID: 10211381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests of the dipole model of perceived movement in apertures.
    Power RP
    Perception; 1993; 22(9):1099-110. PubMed ID: 8041593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Errors in direction-of-motion discrimination with dichoptically viewed stimuli.
    Derrington AM; Fine I; Henning GB
    Vision Res; 1993 Jul; 33(11):1491-4. PubMed ID: 8351821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial gating effects on judged motion of gratings in apertures.
    Power RP; Moulden B
    Perception; 1992; 21(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 1437464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion.
    Shimojo S; Silverman GH; Nakayama K
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(5):619-26. PubMed ID: 2603398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-dimensional tilt illusions induced by orthogonal plaid patterns: effects of plaid motion, orientation, spatial separation, and spatial frequency.
    Wenderoth P; Johnstone S; van der Zwan R
    Perception; 1989; 18(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 2771592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An illusion of relative motion dependent upon spatial frequency and orientation.
    Hine TJ; Cook M; Rogers GT
    Vision Res; 1995 Nov; 35(22):3093-102. PubMed ID: 8533345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apparent motion can be perceived between patterns with dissimilar spatial frequencies.
    Baro JA; Levinson E
    Vision Res; 1988; 28(12):1311-3. PubMed ID: 3256148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.