These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24784400)
21. Three-dimensional maximum a posteriori (MAP) imaging with radiopharmaceuticals labeled with three Cu radionuclides. Ruangma A; Bai B; Lewis JS; Sun X; Welch MJ; Leahy R; Laforest R Nucl Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 16546676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Spatially-variant image-based modeling of PSF deformations with application to a limited angle geometry from a dual-panel breast-PET imager. Gravel P; Surti S; Krishnamoorthy S; Karp JS; Matej S Phys Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 64(22):225015. PubMed ID: 31569078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Resolution recovery on list mode MLEM reconstruction for dynamic cardiac SPECT system. Feng Y; Worstell W; Kupinski M; Furenlid LR; Sabet H Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 37995364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of point spread function-based image reconstruction on neuroreceptor binding in positron emission tomography study with [(11)C]FLB 457. Thongpraparn T; Ikoma Y; Shiraishi T; Yamaya T; Ito H Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 26676853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for Matheoud R; Lecchi M; Lizio D; Scabbio C; Marcassa C; Leva L; Del Sole A; Rodella C; Indovina L; Bracco C; Brambilla M; Zoccarato O J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 24(3):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 26758376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Practical considerations for image-based PSF and blobs reconstruction in PET. Stute S; Comtat C Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3849-70. PubMed ID: 23681172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Applications of the line-of-response probability density function resolution model in PET list mode reconstruction. Jian Y; Yao R; Mulnix T; Jin X; Carson RE Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):253-78. PubMed ID: 25490063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software. Markiewicz PJ; da Costa-Luis C; Dickson J; Barnes A; Krokos G; MacKewn J; Clark T; Wimberley C; MacNaught G; Yaqub MM; Gispert JD; Hutton BF; Marsden P; Hammers A; Reader AJ; Ourselin S; Herholz K; Matthews JC; Barkhof F Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3298-3313. PubMed ID: 35271742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters. Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability. Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Resolution modeling in projection space using a factorized multi-block detector response function for PET image reconstruction. Xu H; Lenz M; Caldeira L; Ma B; Pietrzyk U; Lerche C; Shah NJ; Scheins J Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 64(14):145012. PubMed ID: 31158824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. On the assessment of spatial resolution of PET systems with iterative image reconstruction. Gong K; Cherry SR; Qi J Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):N193-202. PubMed ID: 26864088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Blob-Based Time-of-Flight PET Image Reconstruction in Hybrid Brain PET/MR Imaging. Leemans EL; Kotasidis F; Wissmeyer M; Garibotto V; Zaidi H Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Oct; 17(5):704-13. PubMed ID: 25634260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction. Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Application and evaluation of a measured spatially variant system model for PET image reconstruction. Alessio AM; Stearns CW; Tong S; Ross SG; Kohlmyer S; Ganin A; Kinahan PE IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):938-49. PubMed ID: 20199927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterization of time of flight and resolution modeling on image quality in positron emission tomography. Moretti TJ; Leon SM; Schaeffer CJ; Arreola M J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 23(10):e13751. PubMed ID: 35976771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Image reconstructions from super-sampled data sets with resolution modeling in PET imaging. Li Y; Matej S; Metzler SD Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121912. PubMed ID: 25471972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of a spatially variant resolution model for small animal brain PET studies. Miranda A; Bertoglio D; Glorie D; Stroobants S; Staelens S; Verhaeghe J Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045001. PubMed ID: 33444262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring. Kurz C; Bauer J; Conti M; Guérin L; Eriksson L; Parodi K Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3979-91. PubMed ID: 26133598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]