100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24784474)
1. Is open-access publishing the wave of the future in science?
Pierce GN
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2014 May; 92(5):iii. PubMed ID: 24784474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Open access under scrutiny.
Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Open access: is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened?
Barreiro E
Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Dec; 49(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 24029469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
Frey JJ
Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
Banks M
J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peering into the review process.
Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative.
Probst TM; Hagger MS
Stress Health; 2015 Aug; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 26250351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The discourteous reviewer.
Leviton A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review.
Hershey DR
Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6233):424. PubMed ID: 2755503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Harefuah peer review].
Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The multiple faces of journal peer review.
Thatje S
Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Mar; 97(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 20127306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Making the most of peer review.
Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
Loría A; Lisker R
Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Journalistic rights, and wrongs.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 1999 Sep; 99(9):7. PubMed ID: 10489568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perilous terra incognita--open-access journals.
Balon R
Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 38(2):221-3. PubMed ID: 24519801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review and refereeing in science.
Lore W
East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
