100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24784474)
21. Who referees the referees?
Isbister WH
Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Mar; 62(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 1550501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Which scientific article is best qualified for publication?].
Barzilai M
Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):25-6. PubMed ID: 9332053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Why and how articles are accepted or rejected for publication in biomedical journals].
Trilla A
Med Clin (Barc); 1990 Dec; 95(19):732-4. PubMed ID: 2087121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. JHS guidelines on systematic review and meta-analysis submissions.
Chung KC
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 37(6):1121-4. PubMed ID: 22624781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Does editorial peer review work?
Lock S
Ann Intern Med; 1994 Jul; 121(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 8198351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
Beall J
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Misunderstanding of disciplinary decisions].
Crul BV
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(40):2215. PubMed ID: 9864487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Art of Peer Review.
Fraser D
Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns.
Satyanarayana K; Sharma A
Indian J Med Res; 2010 Aug; 132():119-22. PubMed ID: 20716810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The dangers of advocacy in science.
Gitzen RA
Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5839):748. PubMed ID: 17690275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Editing of articles accepted for publication by the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde].
Walvoort HC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Jan; 141(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 9162848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Where is the honor in honorary authorship?
Kressel HY; Dixon AK
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):324-7. PubMed ID: 21386052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
Mower A; Youngkin ME
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Heaven or hell: publishing and revision.
Enns JT
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22288698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Threats to the quality of peer-reviewed radiology journals: identification of the problem and possible solutions.
Berk RN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jan; 150(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 3257120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [New editorial advice from the Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics].
Diesfeldt HF
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2006 Sep; 37(4):132-3. PubMed ID: 17025008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Affirming science and peer-review publishing.
Talley CR
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 May; 66(10):896. PubMed ID: 19420307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Farther, faster, and (hopefully) better!
Link AM; LaRusso NF
Gastroenterology; 1992 Sep; 103(3):1099-101. PubMed ID: 1499911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
