100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24784474)
41. Article review process.
Burr G
Confed Aust Crit Care Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 4(3):17. PubMed ID: 1912646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W
Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.
Svetlov V
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Diversity, debate, and discourse.
Haller KB
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(4):283. PubMed ID: 1941289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Open Medicine and open access.
Palepu A
CMAJ; 2007 Sep; 177(6):606. PubMed ID: 17846448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Publishing biomedical research: roles and responsibilities.
Relman AS
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):23-7. PubMed ID: 2376495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. From manuscript to publication.
Yoder Wise PS
J Contin Educ Nurs; 1992; 23(2):51. PubMed ID: 1564167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Fair-use policies aim to balance access and cost of publishing.
Dylla HF
Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7247):641. PubMed ID: 19494896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The pattern of publishing previously rejected articles in selected journals.
Whitman N; Eyre S
Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3843082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Open access publishing, NIH policy and the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.
Quan SF
J Clin Sleep Med; 2005 Jul; 1(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 17566181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Peer review.
Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6240):275. PubMed ID: 2797137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Confidentiality of referees.
Case M
Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6563):292. PubMed ID: 8552169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The tsunami of open access.
Dixon SD
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2014; 35(2):163-4. PubMed ID: 24509061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals].
Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Open access will mean peer review will become "the job of the many, not the select few".
Short R
BMJ; 2007 Feb; 334(7589):330. PubMed ID: 17303851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Peer review and accountability.
Hardy LK
Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
Jefferson T; Shashok K
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Reflections on efforts to improve medical publishing in Africa.
Gondwe M
Health Info Libr J; 2010 Dec; 27(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 21050375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Diabetic medicine.
Boulton AJ
Diabet Med; 1994; 11(1):5. PubMed ID: 8181252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
