BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

3524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24784800)

  • 1. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Pipitone J; Park MT; Winterburn J; Lett TA; Lerch JP; Pruessner JC; Lepage M; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM;
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():494-512. PubMed ID: 24784800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic segmentation of the hippocampus for preterm neonates from early-in-life to term-equivalent age.
    Guo T; Winterburn JL; Pipitone J; Duerden EG; Park MT; Chau V; Poskitt KJ; Grunau RE; Synnes A; Miller SP; Mallar Chakravarty M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 9():176-93. PubMed ID: 26740912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating accuracy of striatal, pallidal, and thalamic segmentation methods: Comparing automated approaches to manual delineation.
    Makowski C; Béland S; Kostopoulos P; Bhagwat N; Devenyi GA; Malla AK; Joober R; Lepage M; Chakravarty MM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():182-198. PubMed ID: 28259781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and bias of automatic hippocampal segmentation in children and adolescents.
    Herten A; Konrad K; Krinzinger H; Seitz J; von Polier GG
    Brain Struct Funct; 2019 Mar; 224(2):795-810. PubMed ID: 30511334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-atlas based method for automated anatomical Macaca fascicularis brain MRI segmentation and PET kinetic extraction.
    Ballanger B; Tremblay L; Sgambato-Faure V; Beaudoin-Gobert M; Lavenne F; Le Bars D; Costes N
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 77():26-43. PubMed ID: 23537938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel in vivo atlas of human hippocampal subfields using high-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Winterburn JL; Pruessner JC; Chavez S; Schira MM; Lobaugh NJ; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():254-65. PubMed ID: 23415948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI.
    Iglesias JE; Augustinack JC; Nguyen K; Player CM; Player A; Wright M; Roy N; Frosch MP; McKee AC; Wald LL; Fischl B; Van Leemput K;
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 115():117-37. PubMed ID: 25936807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization and validation of automated hippocampal subfield segmentation across the lifespan.
    Bender AR; Keresztes A; Bodammer NC; Shing YL; Werkle-Bergner M; Daugherty AM; Yu Q; Kühn S; Lindenberger U; Raz N
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Feb; 39(2):916-931. PubMed ID: 29171108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using deep learning to segment breast and fibroglandular tissue in MRI volumes.
    Dalmış MU; Litjens G; Holland K; Setio A; Mann R; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):533-546. PubMed ID: 28035663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performing label-fusion-based segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Chakravarty MM; Steadman P; van Eede MC; Calcott RD; Gu V; Shaw P; Raznahan A; Collins DL; Lerch JP
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Oct; 34(10):2635-54. PubMed ID: 22611030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atlas selection for hippocampus segmentation: Relevance evaluation of three meta-information parameters.
    Dill V; Klein PC; Franco AR; Pinho MS
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Apr; 95():90-98. PubMed ID: 29476982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of manual and semi-automated segmentation methods to evaluate hippocampus volume in APP and PS1 transgenic mice obtained via in vivo magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hayes K; Buist R; Vincent TJ; Thiessen JD; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Wang J; Summers AR; Kong J; Li XM; Martin M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 221():103-11. PubMed ID: 24091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal reproducibility of automatically segmented hippocampal subfields: A multisite European 3T study on healthy elderly.
    Marizzoni M; Antelmi L; Bosch B; Bartrés-Faz D; Müller BW; Wiltfang J; Fiedler U; Roccatagliata L; Picco A; Nobili F; Blin O; Bombois S; Lopes R; Sein J; Ranjeva JP; Didic M; Gros-Dagnac H; Payoux P; Zoccatelli G; Alessandrini F; Beltramello A; Bargalló N; Ferretti A; Caulo M; Aiello M; Cavaliere C; Soricelli A; Salvadori N; Parnetti L; Tarducci R; Floridi P; Tsolaki M; Constantinidis M; Drevelegas A; Rossini PM; Marra C; Hoffmann KT; Hensch T; Schönknecht P; Kuijer JP; Visser PJ; Barkhof F; Bordet R; Frisoni GB; Jovicich J;
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3516-27. PubMed ID: 26043939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Hippocampal and Extrahippocampal Subregions in Alzheimer's Disease at 3T and 7T: What Atlas Composition Works Best?
    Xie L; Shinohara RT; Ittyerah R; Kuijf HJ; Pluta JB; Blom K; Kooistra M; Reijmer YD; Koek HL; Zwanenburg JJM; Wang H; Luijten PR; Geerlings MI; Das SR; Biessels GJ; Wolk DA; Yushkevich PA; Wisse LEM
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2018; 63(1):217-225. PubMed ID: 29614654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. STEPS: Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations and its application to hippocampal segmentation and brain parcelation.
    Jorge Cardoso M; Leung K; Modat M; Keihaninejad S; Cash D; Barnes J; Fox NC; Ourselin S;
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Aug; 17(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 23510558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derivation of high-resolution MRI atlases of the human cerebellum at 3T and segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Park MT; Pipitone J; Baer LH; Winterburn JL; Shah Y; Chavez S; Schira MM; Lobaugh NJ; Lerch JP; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 95():217-31. PubMed ID: 24657354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi-center 3T MRI studies: a comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal segmentations.
    Jovicich J; Marizzoni M; Sala-Llonch R; Bosch B; Bartrés-Faz D; Arnold J; Benninghoff J; Wiltfang J; Roccatagliata L; Nobili F; Hensch T; Tränkner A; Schönknecht P; Leroy M; Lopes R; Bordet R; Chanoine V; Ranjeva JP; Didic M; Gros-Dagnac H; Payoux P; Zoccatelli G; Alessandrini F; Beltramello A; Bargalló N; Blin O; Frisoni GB;
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():472-84. PubMed ID: 23668971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age and Alzheimer's disease on hippocampal subfields: comparison between manual and FreeSurfer volumetry.
    de Flores R; La Joie R; Landeau B; Perrotin A; Mézenge F; de La Sayette V; Eustache F; Desgranges B; Chételat G
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Feb; 36(2):463-74. PubMed ID: 25231681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children: Assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation.
    Schoemaker D; Buss C; Head K; Sandman CA; Davis EP; Chakravarty MM; Gauthier S; Pruessner JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():1-14. PubMed ID: 26824403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A direct morphometric comparison of five labeling protocols for multi-atlas driven automatic segmentation of the hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease.
    Nestor SM; Gibson E; Gao FQ; Kiss A; Black SE;
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():50-70. PubMed ID: 23142652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 177.