These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

3535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24784800)

  • 1. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Pipitone J; Park MT; Winterburn J; Lett TA; Lerch JP; Pruessner JC; Lepage M; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM;
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():494-512. PubMed ID: 24784800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic segmentation of the hippocampus for preterm neonates from early-in-life to term-equivalent age.
    Guo T; Winterburn JL; Pipitone J; Duerden EG; Park MT; Chau V; Poskitt KJ; Grunau RE; Synnes A; Miller SP; Mallar Chakravarty M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 9():176-93. PubMed ID: 26740912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating accuracy of striatal, pallidal, and thalamic segmentation methods: Comparing automated approaches to manual delineation.
    Makowski C; Béland S; Kostopoulos P; Bhagwat N; Devenyi GA; Malla AK; Joober R; Lepage M; Chakravarty MM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():182-198. PubMed ID: 28259781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and bias of automatic hippocampal segmentation in children and adolescents.
    Herten A; Konrad K; Krinzinger H; Seitz J; von Polier GG
    Brain Struct Funct; 2019 Mar; 224(2):795-810. PubMed ID: 30511334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-atlas based method for automated anatomical Macaca fascicularis brain MRI segmentation and PET kinetic extraction.
    Ballanger B; Tremblay L; Sgambato-Faure V; Beaudoin-Gobert M; Lavenne F; Le Bars D; Costes N
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 77():26-43. PubMed ID: 23537938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel in vivo atlas of human hippocampal subfields using high-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Winterburn JL; Pruessner JC; Chavez S; Schira MM; Lobaugh NJ; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():254-65. PubMed ID: 23415948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI.
    Iglesias JE; Augustinack JC; Nguyen K; Player CM; Player A; Wright M; Roy N; Frosch MP; McKee AC; Wald LL; Fischl B; Van Leemput K;
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 115():117-37. PubMed ID: 25936807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization and validation of automated hippocampal subfield segmentation across the lifespan.
    Bender AR; Keresztes A; Bodammer NC; Shing YL; Werkle-Bergner M; Daugherty AM; Yu Q; Kühn S; Lindenberger U; Raz N
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Feb; 39(2):916-931. PubMed ID: 29171108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using deep learning to segment breast and fibroglandular tissue in MRI volumes.
    Dalmış MU; Litjens G; Holland K; Setio A; Mann R; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):533-546. PubMed ID: 28035663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performing label-fusion-based segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Chakravarty MM; Steadman P; van Eede MC; Calcott RD; Gu V; Shaw P; Raznahan A; Collins DL; Lerch JP
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Oct; 34(10):2635-54. PubMed ID: 22611030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atlas selection for hippocampus segmentation: Relevance evaluation of three meta-information parameters.
    Dill V; Klein PC; Franco AR; Pinho MS
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Apr; 95():90-98. PubMed ID: 29476982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of manual and semi-automated segmentation methods to evaluate hippocampus volume in APP and PS1 transgenic mice obtained via in vivo magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hayes K; Buist R; Vincent TJ; Thiessen JD; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Wang J; Summers AR; Kong J; Li XM; Martin M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 221():103-11. PubMed ID: 24091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal reproducibility of automatically segmented hippocampal subfields: A multisite European 3T study on healthy elderly.
    Marizzoni M; Antelmi L; Bosch B; Bartrés-Faz D; Müller BW; Wiltfang J; Fiedler U; Roccatagliata L; Picco A; Nobili F; Blin O; Bombois S; Lopes R; Sein J; Ranjeva JP; Didic M; Gros-Dagnac H; Payoux P; Zoccatelli G; Alessandrini F; Beltramello A; Bargalló N; Ferretti A; Caulo M; Aiello M; Cavaliere C; Soricelli A; Salvadori N; Parnetti L; Tarducci R; Floridi P; Tsolaki M; Constantinidis M; Drevelegas A; Rossini PM; Marra C; Hoffmann KT; Hensch T; Schönknecht P; Kuijer JP; Visser PJ; Barkhof F; Bordet R; Frisoni GB; Jovicich J;
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3516-27. PubMed ID: 26043939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Hippocampal and Extrahippocampal Subregions in Alzheimer's Disease at 3T and 7T: What Atlas Composition Works Best?
    Xie L; Shinohara RT; Ittyerah R; Kuijf HJ; Pluta JB; Blom K; Kooistra M; Reijmer YD; Koek HL; Zwanenburg JJM; Wang H; Luijten PR; Geerlings MI; Das SR; Biessels GJ; Wolk DA; Yushkevich PA; Wisse LEM
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2018; 63(1):217-225. PubMed ID: 29614654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. STEPS: Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations and its application to hippocampal segmentation and brain parcelation.
    Jorge Cardoso M; Leung K; Modat M; Keihaninejad S; Cash D; Barnes J; Fox NC; Ourselin S;
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Aug; 17(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 23510558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derivation of high-resolution MRI atlases of the human cerebellum at 3T and segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Park MT; Pipitone J; Baer LH; Winterburn JL; Shah Y; Chavez S; Schira MM; Lobaugh NJ; Lerch JP; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 95():217-31. PubMed ID: 24657354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi-center 3T MRI studies: a comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal segmentations.
    Jovicich J; Marizzoni M; Sala-Llonch R; Bosch B; Bartrés-Faz D; Arnold J; Benninghoff J; Wiltfang J; Roccatagliata L; Nobili F; Hensch T; Tränkner A; Schönknecht P; Leroy M; Lopes R; Bordet R; Chanoine V; Ranjeva JP; Didic M; Gros-Dagnac H; Payoux P; Zoccatelli G; Alessandrini F; Beltramello A; Bargalló N; Blin O; Frisoni GB;
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():472-84. PubMed ID: 23668971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age and Alzheimer's disease on hippocampal subfields: comparison between manual and FreeSurfer volumetry.
    de Flores R; La Joie R; Landeau B; Perrotin A; Mézenge F; de La Sayette V; Eustache F; Desgranges B; Chételat G
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Feb; 36(2):463-74. PubMed ID: 25231681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children: Assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation.
    Schoemaker D; Buss C; Head K; Sandman CA; Davis EP; Chakravarty MM; Gauthier S; Pruessner JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():1-14. PubMed ID: 26824403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A direct morphometric comparison of five labeling protocols for multi-atlas driven automatic segmentation of the hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease.
    Nestor SM; Gibson E; Gao FQ; Kiss A; Black SE;
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():50-70. PubMed ID: 23142652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 177.