These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24785078)

  • 1. Is the voter model a model for voters?
    Fernández-Gracia J; Suchecki K; Ramasco JJ; San Miguel M; Eguíluz VM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Apr; 112(15):158701. PubMed ID: 24785078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voter model on networks and the multivariate beta distribution.
    Mori S; Hisakado M; Nakayama K
    Phys Rev E; 2019 May; 99(5-1):052307. PubMed ID: 31212470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Zealots in the mean-field noisy voter model.
    Khalil N; San Miguel M; Toral R
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jan; 97(1-1):012310. PubMed ID: 29448335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social Security: a financial appraisal for the median voter.
    Galasso V
    Soc Secur Bull; 2001-2002; 64(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 12428510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between the lifestyle health index and voter turnout during the 2020 United States presidential election in the context of regional cultures.
    Arena R; Pronk NP; Kottke TE; Arena A; Woodard C
    Public Health Pract (Oxf); 2024 Dec; 8():100534. PubMed ID: 39263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are We Rational or Not? The Exploration of Voter Choices during the 2016 Presidential and Legislative Elections in Taiwan.
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Yen NS; Tsai CH; Cheng HP
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1762. PubMed ID: 29075215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for voter rigging in small polling stations.
    Jimenez R; Hidalgo M; Klimek P
    Sci Adv; 2017 Jun; 3(6):e1602363. PubMed ID: 28695193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Waiting to vote safely: How Covid-19 safety measures shaped in-person voter wait times during the 2020 election.
    Coll J
    Soc Sci Q; 2022 Mar; 103(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 35602178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity.
    Jenke L; Huettel SA
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():566020. PubMed ID: 33178071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resolving Contested Elections: The Limited Power of Post-Vote Vote-Choice Data.
    Glynn AN; Richardson TS; Handcock MS
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2010; 105(489):84-91. PubMed ID: 26640307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Election turnout statistics in many countries: similarities, differences, and a diffusive field model for decision-making.
    Borghesi C; Raynal JC; Bouchaud JP
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36289. PubMed ID: 22615762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
    Granberg D; Burlison J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heterogeneous voter models.
    Masuda N; Gibert N; Redner S
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Jul; 82(1 Pt 1):010103. PubMed ID: 20866551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fitness voter model: Damped oscillations and anomalous consensus.
    Woolcock A; Connaughton C; Merali Y; Vazquez F
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Sep; 96(3-1):032313. PubMed ID: 29346969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of social diversity on the emergence of global consensus in opinion dynamics.
    Yang HX; Wu ZX; Zhou C; Zhou T; Wang BH
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Oct; 80(4 Pt 2):046108. PubMed ID: 19905391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Zealots in multistate noisy voter models.
    Khalil N; Galla T
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Jan; 103(1-1):012311. PubMed ID: 33601527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective multidimensional crossover behavior in a one-dimensional voter model with long-range probabilistic interactions.
    Rodriguez DE; Bab MA; Albano EV
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Jan; 83(1 Pt 1):011110. PubMed ID: 21405664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health care in the 2004 presidential election.
    Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1314-22. PubMed ID: 15385658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of timescale to consensus in voting dynamics with more than two options.
    Wu D; Szeto KY
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Apr; 97(4-1):042320. PubMed ID: 29758618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.