These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24785480)

  • 21. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shen X; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; Zhou X; He S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1612-6. PubMed ID: 24814852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Critical Analysis of Sagittal Plane Deformity Correction With Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Mundis GM; Turner JD; Deverin V; Uribe JS; Nunley P; Mummaneni P; Anand N; Park P; Okonkwo DO; Wang MY; Bess S; Kanter AS; Fessler R; Nguyen S; Akbarnia BA;
    Spine Deform; 2017 Jul; 5(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 28622902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ntoukas V; Müller A
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2010 Feb; 53(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 20376740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
    Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Wang HL; Lü FZ; Jiang JY; Ma X; Xia XL; Wang LX
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 22340311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intermediate-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with less invasive adult spinal deformity surgery: patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years.
    Wang MY; Park P; Tran S; Anand N; Nunley P; Kanter A; Fessler R; Uribe J; Eastlack R; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Mundis GM; Brusko GD; Mummaneni PV;
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2020 Jun; 162(6):1393-1400. PubMed ID: 32291591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparison of traumatic related index in serum between minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for tissue injury].
    Zou S; Wang J; Pan W; Zheng Y; Huang B
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):960-4. PubMed ID: 24171351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
    Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incremental benefits of circumferential minimally invasive surgery for increasingly frail patients with adult spinal deformity.
    Passias PG; Tretiakov PS; Nunley PD; Wang MY; Park P; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Eastlack RK; Mundis GM; Chou D; Agarwal N; Fessler RG; Uribe JS; Anand N; Than KD; Brusko G; Fu KM; Turner JD; Le VP; Line BG; Ames CP; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Hart RA; Burton D; Lafage R; Lafage V; Schwab F; Bess S; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 37086158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of minimally invasive transspinous and open approaches for thoracolumbar intradural-extramedullary spinal tumors.
    Raygor KP; Than KD; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E12. PubMed ID: 26235010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical study on lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Ren XJ; Chu TW; Wang WD; Zheng WJ; Pan Y; Huang B
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1076-80. PubMed ID: 22333446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis stenosis].
    Ding Y; He S; Zhang H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 27(4):404-8. PubMed ID: 23757864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis.
    Anand N; Rosemann R; Khalsa B; Baron EM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Mar; 28(3):E6. PubMed ID: 20192666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques.
    Bagan B; Patel N; Deutsch H; Harrop J; Sharan A; Vaccaro AR; Ratliff JK
    Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():281-6. PubMed ID: 18802914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.