These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24785484)

  • 21. Adult scoliosis in patients over sixty-five years of age: outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment at a minimum two-year follow-up.
    Li G; Passias P; Kozanek M; Fu E; Wang S; Xia Q; Li G; Rand FE; Wood KB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2165-70. PubMed ID: 19713875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost and value of spinal deformity surgery.
    Paulus MC; Kalantar SB; Radcliff K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 24573071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dissecting the effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude on quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Tsutsui S; Pawelek J; Bastrom T; Lenke L; Lowe T; Betz R; Clements D; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E653-8. PubMed ID: 19680091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients.
    Bess S; Boachie-Adjei O; Burton D; Cunningham M; Shaffrey C; Shelokov A; Hostin R; Schwab F; Wood K; Akbarnia B;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2186-90. PubMed ID: 19752704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Functional Limitations Due to Lumbar Stiffness in Adults With and Without Spinal Deformity.
    Daniels AH; Smith JS; Hiratzka J; Ames CP; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Schwab FJ; Lafage V; Klineberg EO; Burton D; Mundis GM; Line B; Hart RA;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):1599-604. PubMed ID: 26731705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nonoperative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 10- to 60-year follow-up with special reference to health-related quality of life.
    Haefeli M; Elfering A; Kilian R; Min K; Boos N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(3):355-66; discussion 367. PubMed ID: 16449911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of spinal deformity surgery in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) versus controls.
    Cho W; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Dorward IG; Shoda N; Baldus CR; Cho SK; Kang MM; Zebala LP; Pahys JM; Koester LA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E978-84. PubMed ID: 22343274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?
    Bridwell KH; Berven S; Glassman S; Hamill C; Horton WC; Lenke LG; Schwab F; Baldus C; Shainline M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(20):2220-5. PubMed ID: 17873814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Bridwell KH; Berven SH; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 25774463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year follow-up.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Berven S; Glassman S; Hamill C; Horton W; Ondra S; Schwab F; Shainline M; Fu KM; Bridwell K;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):1693-8. PubMed ID: 19770610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery?
    Glassman SD; Schwab F; Bridwell KH; Shaffrey C; Horton W; Hu S
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 18774752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cultural Variations in the Minimum Clinically Important Difference Thresholds for SRS-22R After Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Arima H; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Yamato Y; Hasegawa T; Togawa D; Kobayashi S; Yoshida G; Yasuda T; Banno T; Oe S; Mihara Y; Ushirozako H; Matsuyama Y
    Spine Deform; 2019 Jul; 7(4):627-632. PubMed ID: 31202381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.
    Liu S; Schwab F; Smith JS; Klineberg E; Ames CP; Mundis G; Hostin R; Kebaish K; Deviren V; Gupta M; Boachie-Adjei O; Hart RA; Bess S; Lafage V
    Ochsner J; 2014; 14(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 24688336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proximal junctional kyphosis results in inferior SRS pain subscores in adult deformity patients.
    Kim HJ; Bridwell KH; Lenke LG; Park MS; Ahmad A; Song KS; Piyaskulkaew C; Hershman S; Fogelson J; Mesfin A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):896-901. PubMed ID: 23232215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Traumatic thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures: operative or nonoperative treatment: comparison of two treatment strategies by means of surgeon equipoise.
    Stadhouder A; Buskens E; de Klerk LW; Verhaar JA; Dhert WA; Verbout AJ; Vaccaro AR; Oner FC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(9):1006-17. PubMed ID: 18427323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort.
    Terran J; Schwab F; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; Devos P; Ames CP; Fu KM; Burton D; Hostin R; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Deviren V; Mundis G; Hart R; Bess S; Lafage V;
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Oct; 73(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 23756751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The timing of surgical staging has a significant impact on the complications and functional outcomes of adult spinal deformity surgery.
    Hassanzadeh H; Gjolaj JP; El Dafrawy MH; Jain A; Skolasky RL; Cohen DB; Kebaish KM
    Spine J; 2013 Dec; 13(12):1717-22. PubMed ID: 23602375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients.
    Haque RM; Mundis GM; Ahmed Y; El Ahmadieh TY; Wang MY; Mummaneni PV; Uribe JS; Okonkwo DO; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Kanter AS; La Marca F; Akbarnia BA; Park P; Lafage V; Terran JS; Shaffrey CI; Klineberg E; Deviren V; Fessler RG;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E13. PubMed ID: 24785478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Major complications and comparison between 3-column osteotomy techniques in 105 consecutive spinal deformity procedures.
    Auerbach JD; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Sehn JK; Milby AH; Bumpass D; Crawford CH; OʼShaughnessy BA; Buchowski JM; Chang MS; Zebala LP; Sides BA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):1198-210. PubMed ID: 22366971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Discriminative validity of the Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire among five curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
    Berliner JL; Verma K; Lonner BS; Penn PU; Bharucha NJ
    Spine J; 2013 Feb; 13(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23218828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.