These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24785592)

  • 1. Multitasking and aging: do older adults benefit from performing a highly practiced task?
    Allen PA; Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Voss A
    Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(3):280-307. PubMed ID: 24785592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally.
    Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Elicker JD; Lien MC
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):369-99. PubMed ID: 20183098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multitasking in aging: ERP correlates of dual-task costs in young versus low, intermediate, and high performing older adults.
    Thönes S; Falkenstein M; Gajewski PD
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():424-433. PubMed ID: 30218690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lost ability to automatize task performance in old age.
    Maquestiaux F; Didierjean A; Ruthruff E; Chauvel G; Hartley A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1206-12. PubMed ID: 23606136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychological refractory period: evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Vires-Collins H; Sperry S
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Jun; 13(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 9640583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Hartley A; Bherer L
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):177-92. PubMed ID: 20230138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations.
    Hein G; Schubert T
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 15382993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ideomotor-compatible tasks partially escape dual-task interference in both young and elderly adults.
    Hartley AA; Seaman B; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Mar; 30(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25689613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-task compatibility and age-related dual-task performance.
    Grabbe JW; Allen PA
    Exp Aging Res; 2012; 38(5):469-87. PubMed ID: 23092219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.
    Beste C; Yildiz A; Meissner TW; Wolf OT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 252():260-5. PubMed ID: 23769959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age differences in dual-task performance after practice.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Sep; 22(3):596-606. PubMed ID: 17874957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal discrimination of one's own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1806-16. PubMed ID: 27311578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
    Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.
    Strobach T; Karbach J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104866. PubMed ID: 32531496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance.
    Reissland J; Manzey D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():27-40. PubMed ID: 27155317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parallel response selection after callosotomy.
    Hazeltine E; Weinstein A; Ivry RB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 18004953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A neuropsychological assessment of dual-task costs in closed-head injury patients using Cohen's effect size estimation method.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Pashler H
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 16142490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.