These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24786355)
1. Contrasting the ethical perspectives of biospecimen research among individuals with familial risk for hereditary cancer and biomedical researchers: implications for researcher training. Quinn GP; Koskan A; Sehovic I; Pal T; Meade C; Gwede CK Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2014 Jul; 18(7):467-73. PubMed ID: 24786355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Web-Based Platform for Educating Researchers About Bioethics and Biobanking. Sehovic I; Gwede CK; Meade CD; Sodeke S; Pentz R; Quinn GP J Cancer Educ; 2016 Jun; 31(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 25773136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants. Purvis RS; Long CR; Eisenberg LR; Hester DM; Cunningham TV; Holland A; Chatrathi HE; McElfish PA AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):104-113. PubMed ID: 32163009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa. Moodley K; Singh S BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can we do better? Researchers' experiences with ethical review boards on projects with later life as a focus. Pachana NA; Liddle J; Peel NM; Beattie E; Juang C; Knight BG J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 43(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 25374104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers. Whitley EA; Kanellopoulou N; Kaye J Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):232-42. PubMed ID: 22722687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research Ethics for Clinical Researchers. Harnett JD Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():53-64. PubMed ID: 33871838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies. Birchley G; Huxtable R; Murtagh M; Ter Meulen R; Flach P; Gooberman-Hill R BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):23. PubMed ID: 28376811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biobanking in Israel 2016-17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment. Koren G; Beller D; Laifenfeld D; Grossman I; Shalev V BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 29149849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region. Oushy MH; Palacios R; Holden AE; Ramirez AG; Gallion KJ; O'Connell MA PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138239. PubMed ID: 26378445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review. De Sutter E; Zaçe D; Boccia S; Di Pietro ML; Geerts D; Borry P; Huys I J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e19129. PubMed ID: 33030440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedical scientists' perceptions of ethical and social implications: is there a role for research ethics consultation? McCormick JB; Boyce AM; Cho MK PLoS One; 2009; 4(3):e4659. PubMed ID: 19252737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent. Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand. Kaewkungwal J; Adams P Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Researchers' perceptions of the ethical implications of pharmacogenomics research with children. Avard D; Silverstein T; Sillon G; Joly Y Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 19204423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What Potential Donors in Research Biobanking Want to Know: A Large Population Study of the Italian Twin Registry. Toccaceli V; Brescianini S; Fagnani C; Gigantesco A; D'Abramo F; Stazi MA Biopreserv Biobank; 2016 Dec; 14(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 27327227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Writing to template: Researchers' negotiation of procedural research ethics. Chiumento A; Rahman A; Frith L Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 255():112980. PubMed ID: 32311514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies. Hobbs A; Starkbaum J; Gottweis U; Wichmann HE; Gottweis H Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):272-84. PubMed ID: 22722691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dealing with Ethical Concerns in Suicide Research: A Survey of Australian Researchers. Andriessen K; Reifels L; Krysinska K; Robinson J; Dempster G; Pirkis J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 30934714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]