These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24787571)
1. Auditing a breast MRI practice: performance measures for screening and diagnostic breast MRI. Niell BL; Gavenonis SC; Motazedi T; Chubiz JC; Halpern EP; Rafferty EA; Lee JM J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 24787571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed biopsy performance benchmarks for MRI based on an audit of a large academic center. Sedora Román NI; Mehta TS; Sharpe RE; Slanetz PJ; Venkataraman S; Fein-Zachary V; Dialani V Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):319-324. PubMed ID: 28833841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence and Predictive Value of BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Correlation with Study Indication. Chikarmane SA; Tai R; Meyer JE; Giess CS Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):435-441. PubMed ID: 27955878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammogram-based Deep Learning and Traditional Breast Cancer Risk Models in Patients Who Underwent Supplemental Screening with MRI. Lamb LR; Mercaldo SF; Ghaderi K; Carney A; Lehman CD Radiology; 2023 Sep; 308(3):e223077. PubMed ID: 37724967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening Digital Mammography Recall Rate: Does It Change with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Experience? DiPrete O; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Mainiero MB Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):838-844. PubMed ID: 29173123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women. Lee CS; Goldman L; Grimm LJ; Liu IX; Simanowith M; Rosenberg R; Zuley M; Moy L Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Feb; 203(3):599-612. PubMed ID: 37897646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiologist Characteristics Associated with Interpretive Performance of Screening Mammography: A National Mammography Database (NMD) Study. Lee CS; Moy L; Hughes D; Golden D; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Hemingway J; Geras A; Duszak R; Rosenkrantz AB Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):518-528. PubMed ID: 34156300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening Breast MRI in Patients Previously Treated for Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Yield for Cancer and Abnormal Interpretation Rate. Giess CS; Poole PS; Chikarmane SA; Sippo DA; Birdwell RL Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1331-7. PubMed ID: 26142951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening. Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations. Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. Leung JW; Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices. Lee CI; Ichikawa L; Rochelle MC; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Sprague BL; DeMartini WB; Wernli KJ; Joe BN; Yankaskas BC; Lehman CD Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1370-6. PubMed ID: 25126973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of Screening Breast MRI After Negative Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus After Negative Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women at Higher Than Average Risk for Breast Cancer. Roark AA; Dang PA; Niell BL; Halpern EF; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 30540208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) screening in women with a personal history (PH) of breast cancer. An YY; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Suh YJ; Jeon YW PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230347. PubMed ID: 32163500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]