These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2478849)

  • 1. Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment.
    Tuffnell DJ; Bryce F; Johnson N; Lilford RJ
    Lancet; 1989 Nov; 2(8671):1089-90. PubMed ID: 2478849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
    Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
    BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inaccuracy in cervical dilatation assessment and the progress of labour monitoring.
    Letić M
    Med Hypotheses; 2003 Feb; 60(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 12606235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of an instrument for monitoring dilatation of the cervix during labour.
    Richardson JA; Sutherland IA; Allen DW; Doré F
    Biomed Eng; 1976 Sep; 11(9):311-3. PubMed ID: 989740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing cervical dilatation without VEs. Watching the purple line.
    Hobbs L
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Nov; 1(11):34-5. PubMed ID: 10214276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is normal progress in the first stage of labour? A vignette study of similarities and differences between midwives and obstetricians.
    Romijn MSc A; Muijtjens Dr Ir AM; de Bruijne Dr MC; Donkers Dr HH; Wagner Prof Dr C; de Groot Prof Dr CJ; Teunissen Dr PW
    Midwifery; 2016 Oct; 41():104-109. PubMed ID: 27586088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effacement and dilatation of the uterine cervix.
    MINES JL
    J Osteopath (Kirksvill); 1962 Jun; 69():15-8. PubMed ID: 14474308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cervical ripeness. I. The clinical criteria of assessment of ripeness and their variability at term].
    Lamberti G
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1982; 186(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 6891536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements.
    Phelps JY; Higby K; Smyth MH; Ward JA; Arredondo F; Mayer AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 173(3 Pt 1):942-5. PubMed ID: 7573274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Partograms and nomograms of cervical dilatation in management of primigravid labour.
    Studd J
    Br Med J; 1973 Nov; 4(5890):451-5. PubMed ID: 4758447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous monitoring of cervical dilatation during labour by ultrasonic transit-time measurement.
    Zador I; Neuman MR; Wolfson RN
    Med Biol Eng; 1976 May; 14(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 940390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A continuous objective measurement of cervix dilatation during labour. Technical description and preliminary results (author's transl)].
    Lewin D; Sadoul G; Beuret T; Sylvain-Leroy B
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1978 Jan; 7(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 580433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians.
    Holcomb WL; Smeltzer JS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jul; 78(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2047066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indications and results of labour induction in nulliparous women: an interview among obstetricians, residents and clinical midwives.
    Vellekoop J; Vrouenraets FP; van der Steeg JW; Mol BW; Roumen FJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Oct; 146(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 19586709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A longitudinal study investigating cervical changes during labor using a wireless ultrasound device.
    Kim J; Kim S; Jeon S; Jung S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(13):1787-1791. PubMed ID: 28627262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cervimeter for continuous measurement of cervical dilatation in labour--Preliminary results.
    Friedman EA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Aug; 85(8):638. PubMed ID: 687546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical assessment: visual or digital?
    Morgan MA; de Veciana M; Rumney PJ; Schlinke S
    J Perinatol; 1996; 16(2 Pt 1):103-6. PubMed ID: 8732556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cervimeter for continuous measurement of cervical dilatation in labour--preliminary results.
    Richardson JA; Sutherland IA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Dec; 85(12):975-6. PubMed ID: 737160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation in intrapartum referral rates in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.
    Offerhaus PM; Otten W; Boxem-Tiemessen JC; de Jonge A; van der Pal-de Bruin KM; Scheepers PL; Lagro-Janssen AL
    Midwifery; 2015 Apr; 31(4):e69-78. PubMed ID: 25660846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Continuous cervix measurement (author's transl)].
    Kruse HJ; Fehlauer KU; Holm P; Volkmar H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1979; 101(9):602-7. PubMed ID: 384716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.