BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24789138)

  • 41. Femme/Butch/Androgyne Identity and Preferences for Femininity Across Face, Voice, and Personality Traits in Chinese Lesbian and Bisexual Women.
    Zhang J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2022 Oct; 51(7):3485-3495. PubMed ID: 36028632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Comparison of Masculinity Facial Preference Among Naturally Cycling, Pregnant, Lactating, and Post-Menopausal Women.
    Marcinkowska UM; Jasienska G; Prokop P
    Arch Sex Behav; 2018 Jul; 47(5):1367-1374. PubMed ID: 29071543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of stress on women's preference for male facial masculinity and their endocrine correlates.
    Ditzen B; Palm-Fischbacher S; Gossweiler L; Stucky L; Ehlert U
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2017 Aug; 82():67-74. PubMed ID: 28511046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Little AC; Boothroyd LG; Perrett DI; Penton-Voak IS; Cooper PA; Penke L; Feinberg DR; Tiddeman BP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Jun; 273(1592):1355-60. PubMed ID: 16777723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Family size and sex preferences and eventual fertility in Botswana.
    Campbell EK; Campbell PG
    J Biosoc Sci; 1997 Apr; 29(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 9881130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jul; 52(5):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 37245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mating Strategies and the Masculinity Paradox: How Relationship Context, Relationship Status, and Sociosexuality Shape Women's Preferences for Facial Masculinity and Beardedness.
    Stower RE; Lee AJ; McIntosh TL; Sidari MJ; Sherlock JM; Dixson BJW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2020 Apr; 49(3):809-820. PubMed ID: 31016490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mothers are sensitive to men's beards as a potential cue of paternal investment.
    Dixson BJW; Kennedy-Costantini S; Lee AJ; Nelson NL
    Horm Behav; 2019 Jul; 113():55-66. PubMed ID: 30978339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Role of Facial and Body Hair Distribution in Women's Judgments of Men's Sexual Attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Rantala MJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 May; 45(4):877-89. PubMed ID: 26292838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Women on men's sexual health and sexually transmitted infection testing: a gender relations analysis.
    Oliffe JL; Chabot C; Knight R; Davis W; Bungay V; Shoveller JA
    Sociol Health Illn; 2013 Jan; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 22497206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology.
    Clarkson TR; Sidari MJ; Sains R; Alexander M; Harrison M; Mefodeva V; Pearson S; Lee AJ; Dixson BJW
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Jan; 7(1):191209. PubMed ID: 32218951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Women's preferences for men's facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions.
    Marcinkowska UM; Rantala MJ; Lee AJ; Kozlov MV; Aavik T; Cai H; Contreras-Garduño J; David OA; Kaminski G; Li NP; Onyishi IE; Prasai K; Pazhoohi F; Prokop P; Cardozo SLR; Sydney N; Taniguchi H; Krams I; Dixson BJW
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3387. PubMed ID: 30833635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sex differences in attraction to familiar and unfamiliar opposite-sex faces: men prefer novelty and women prefer familiarity.
    Little AC; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Jul; 43(5):973-81. PubMed ID: 23740467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Does Adult Sex Ratio Predict Regional Variation in Facial Dominance Perceptions? Evidence From an Analysis of U.S. States.
    Torrance JS; Kandrik M; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918776748. PubMed ID: 29860865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli.
    Rennels JL; Bronstad PM; Langlois JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):884-93. PubMed ID: 18665733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women's Hormonal Status.
    Jones BC; Hahn AC; Fisher CI; Wang H; Kandrik M; Han C; Fasolt V; Morrison D; Lee AJ; Holzleitner IJ; O'Shea KJ; Roberts SC; Little AC; DeBruine LM
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jun; 29(6):996-1005. PubMed ID: 29708849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high.
    Jones BC; Little AC; Boothroyd L; Debruine LM; Feinberg DR; Smith MJ; Cornwell RE; Moore FR; Perrett DI
    Horm Behav; 2005 Sep; 48(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 15979620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Male Homosexual Preference: Femininity and the Older Brother Effect in Indonesia.
    Nila S; Crochet PA; Barthes J; Rianti P; Juliandi B; Suryobroto B; Raymond M
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(4):1474704919880701. PubMed ID: 31742436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The eye wants what the heart wants: Female face preferences are related to partner personality preferences.
    Oh D; Grant-Villegas N; Todorov A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1328-1343. PubMed ID: 32757588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Gaze properties of women judging the attractiveness of masculine and feminine male faces.
    Burriss RP; Marcinkowska UM; Lyons MT
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Jan; 12(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 24401278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.