147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24789841)
1. Yes, but don't underestimate estimation: reply to Morey, Rouder, Verhagen, and Wagenmakers (2014).
Fidler F; Cumming G
Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1291-2. PubMed ID: 24789841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: a comment on Cumming (2014).
Morey RD; Rouder JN; Verhagen J; Wagenmakers EJ
Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1289-90. PubMed ID: 24604147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayes Factors Have Frequency Properties-This Should Not Be Ignored: A Rejoinder to Morey, Wagenmakers, and Rouder.
Hoijtink H; van Kooten P; Hulsker K
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 26881953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The new statistics: why and how.
Cumming G
Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 24220629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpreting confidence intervals: A comment on Hoekstra, Morey, Rouder, and Wagenmakers (2014).
Miller J; Ulrich R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 26558758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Letter to the Editor referring to the article 'Testing agreement between a new method and the gold standard -How do we test?' published in Journal of Biomechanics (volume 46, Issue 16, Pages 2757-2760).
Heinrich D
J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3909-10. PubMed ID: 25468665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. P-values and reproductive health: what can clinical researchers learn from the American Statistical Association?
Farland LV; Correia KF; Wise LA; Williams PL; Ginsburg ES; Missmer SA
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2406-2410. PubMed ID: 27664212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibrated Bayes Factors Should Not Be Used: A Reply to Hoijtink, van Kooten, and Hulsker.
Morey RD; Wagenmakers EJ; Rouder JN
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 26881952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Describing numerical variables: which are the most appropriate parameters to describe the data?
Duquia RP; González-Chica DA; Bastos JL; Martínez-Mesa J; Bonamigo RR
An Bras Dermatol; 2017; 92(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29364444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing agreement between a new method and the gold standard-how do we test?
McLaughlin P
J Biomech; 2013 Nov; 46(16):2757-60. PubMed ID: 24094718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Certainty Behind Reporting a Significance Result: What the Clinician Should Know.
Kumbhare D; Alavinia SM
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 98(12):1147-1150. PubMed ID: 31464749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of independent academic statistical analysis.
DeAngelis CD; Fontanarosa PB
Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):383-4. PubMed ID: 20538872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Show the data, don't conceal them.
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
J Physiol; 2011 Apr; 589(Pt 8):1861-3. PubMed ID: 21498378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Guide to the statistical analysis plan.
Yuan I; Topjian AA; Kurth CD; Kirschen MP; Ward CG; Zhang B; Mensinger JL
Paediatr Anaesth; 2019 Mar; 29(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 30609103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical reporting for current and future readers.
Houle TT
Anesthesiology; 2007 Aug; 107(2):193-4. PubMed ID: 17667559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary.
Goodman SN
Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):389-90. PubMed ID: 20538874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistically Speaking.
Chapman-Novakofski K
J Nutr Educ Behav; 2020 Feb; 52(2):105. PubMed ID: 32036996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Power and meaninglessness.
Bogduk N
Pain Med; 2012 Feb; 13(2):148-9. PubMed ID: 22313497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Discussion of Keiding.
Peng RD
Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):393-4. PubMed ID: 20538876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducible research and the substantive context: response to comments.
Keiding N
Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):395-6. PubMed ID: 20498224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
