These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24789896)

  • 21. Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.
    Bel-Venner MC; Dray S; Allainé D; Menu F; Venner S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jan; 275(1630):77-82. PubMed ID: 17956845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Along came a spider who sat down beside her: Perceived predation risk, but not female age, affects female mate choosiness.
    Atwell A; Wagner WE
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():143-8. PubMed ID: 25857998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Natural variation in social conditions affects male mate choosiness in the amphipod
    Lipkowski K; Steigerwald S; Schulte LM; Sommer-Trembo C; Jourdan J
    Curr Zool; 2022 Aug; 68(4):459-468. PubMed ID: 36090139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Moderately elevated glucocorticoids increase mate choosiness but do not affect sexual proceptivity or preferences in female gray treefrogs.
    Baugh AT; Gall MD; Silver SC; Bee MA
    Horm Behav; 2021 Apr; 130():104950. PubMed ID: 33556376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness.
    Kopp M; Hermisson J
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):1005-23. PubMed ID: 18513357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Density-dependent selection on mate search and evolution of Allee effects.
    Berec L; Kramer AM; Bernhauerová V; Drake JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 28240356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.
    Puurtinen M; Fromhage L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Mar; 284(1851):. PubMed ID: 28330914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Black widows as plastic wallflowers: female choosiness increases with indicators of high mate availability in a natural population.
    Scott CE; McCann S; Andrade MCB
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):8981. PubMed ID: 32488193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Indiscriminate Mating and the Coevolution of Sex Discrimination and Sexual Signals.
    Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2023 Apr; 201(4):E56-E69. PubMed ID: 36957998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genetic variation in male attractiveness: It is time to see the forest for the trees.
    Prokop ZM; Drobniak SM
    Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):913-21. PubMed ID: 26940698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Roles of Sexual and Viability Selection in the Evolution of Incomplete Reproductive Isolation: From Allopatry to Sympatry.
    Cotto O; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2017 Nov; 190(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 29053357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evolutionarily stable mating decisions for sequentially searching females and the stability of reproductive isolation by assortative mating.
    Priklopil T; Kisdi E; Gyllenberg M
    Evolution; 2015 Apr; 69(4):1015-26. PubMed ID: 25662095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches.
    Reinhold K; Schielzeth H
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Jan; 201(1):171-82. PubMed ID: 25398575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.
    Fitzpatrick CL; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 27804119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles.
    Owens IP; Thompson DB
    Proc Biol Sci; 1994 Nov; 258(1352):93-9. PubMed ID: 7838858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of temperature on mating behaviour and mating success: A meta-analysis.
    Pilakouta N; Baillet A
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Aug; 91(8):1642-1650. PubMed ID: 35811382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.