These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24790874)
1. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. Bayhan HA; Aslan Bayhan S; Can I Int J Ophthalmol; 2014; 7(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 24790874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of anterior segment parameter values obtained with Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, optical low coherence reflectometry and noncontact specular microscopy in morbid obesity. Dogan B; Dogan U; Erol MK; Habibi M; Oruc MT Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2017 Feb; 21(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28239829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera. Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices. Üçer MB; Bozkurt E Ther Adv Ophthalmol; 2021; 13():2515841421995633. PubMed ID: 33748670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices. Doğan M; Ertan E Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):126-130. PubMed ID: 30557910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precision of Corneal Aberrations Measured by a New SD-OCT/Placido Topographer and Its Agreement With a Scheimpflug/Placido Topographer. Ning R; Niu L; Xing W; Wan T; Huang X; Xiahou J; Wang Y; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Wang X; Huang J J Refract Surg; 2023 Jun; 39(6):405-412. PubMed ID: 37306197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Elbaz U; Schwartz S; Ken-Dror G; Avni I; Zadok D J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1729-35. PubMed ID: 16246776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Standard Ultrasonic Pachymeter in Premature Infants. Hekimoglu E; Erol MK; Toslak D; Turgut Coban D; Doğan B; Yucel O J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():129269. PubMed ID: 26266043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry. Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter. Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of corneal thickness using a Scheimpflug-Placido disk corneal analyzer and comparison with ultrasound pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. Huang J; Lu W; Savini G; Hu L; Pan C; Wang J; Tan W; Chen J; Wang Q J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1074-80. PubMed ID: 23680632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer. Binnawi KH; Elzubeir H; Osman E; Abdu M; Abdu M Oman J Ophthalmol; 2019; 12(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 30787529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis. Jin Y; McAlinden C; Sun Y; Wen D; Wang Y; Yu J; Feng K; Song B; Wang Q; Chen S; Huang J Eye Vis (Lond); 2021 Feb; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 33602345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement between a new optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and an anterior segment optical coherence tomographer. Wang Y; Wan T; Liu L; Xue Y; Chen X; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Yu J; Huang J Eye Vis (Lond); 2023 Feb; 10(1):13. PubMed ID: 36829259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations Measurements: Precision of SD-OCT/Placido Topography and Comparison with a Scheimpflug/Placido Topography in Eyes After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction. Ning R; Huang X; Jin Y; Lei CS; Ma X; Xu S; Xiahou J; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Wang X; Zhou X; Huang J Ophthalmol Ther; 2023 Jun; 12(3):1595-1610. PubMed ID: 36862309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with different non-contact devices in healthy children. Yalcın SO; Kaplan AT Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Dec; 40():103045. PubMed ID: 35908681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry. Chen S; Huang J; Wen D; Chen W; Huang D; Wang Q Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]