These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24791709)

  • 1. A neural network model of individual differences in task switching abilities.
    Herd SA; O'Reilly RC; Hazy TE; Chatham CH; Brant AM; Friedman NP
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():375-89. PubMed ID: 24791709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure.
    Friedman NP; Miyake A
    Cortex; 2017 Jan; 86():186-204. PubMed ID: 27251123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latent profiles of executive functioning in healthy young adults: evidence of individual differences in hemispheric asymmetry.
    Rau HK; Suchy Y; Butner JE; Williams PG
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):997-1019. PubMed ID: 26409468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The overall impairment of core executive function components in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study.
    Zheng D; Dong X; Sun H; Xu Y; Ma Y; Wang X
    BMC Neurol; 2012 Nov; 12():138. PubMed ID: 23164134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A true reflection of executive functioning or a representation of task-specific variance? Re-evaluating the unity/diversity framework.
    Sambol S; Suleyman E; Scarfo J; Ball M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Jun; 236():103934. PubMed ID: 37156119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goal-neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity.
    Morey CC; Elliott EM; Wiggers J; Eaves SD; Shelton JT; Mall JT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 22749714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in the Simon effect are underpinned by differences in the competitive dynamics in the basal ganglia: An experimental verification and a computational model.
    Stocco A; Murray NL; Yamasaki BL; Renno TJ; Nguyen J; Prat CS
    Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():31-45. PubMed ID: 28363106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional connectivity at rest is sensitive to individual differences in executive function: A network analysis.
    Reineberg AE; Banich MT
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Aug; 37(8):2959-75. PubMed ID: 27167614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resting-state networks predict individual differences in common and specific aspects of executive function.
    Reineberg AE; Andrews-Hanna JR; Depue BE; Friedman NP; Banich MT
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():69-78. PubMed ID: 25281800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practice on conflict tasks promotes executive function of working memory in the elderly.
    Osaka M; Yaoi K; Otsuka Y; Katsuhara M; Osaka N
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 233(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 22579495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural substrates of the executive function construct, age-related changes, and task materials in adolescents and adults: ALE meta-analyses of 408 fMRI studies.
    Zhang Z; Peng P; Eickhoff SB; Lin X; Zhang D; Wang Y
    Dev Sci; 2021 Nov; 24(6):e13111. PubMed ID: 33817920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overcoming residual interference in mental set switching: neural correlates and developmental trajectory.
    Witt ST; Stevens MC
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):2055-64. PubMed ID: 22584223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A large-scale neurocomputational model of task-oriented behavior selection and working memory in prefrontal cortex.
    Chadderdon GL; Sporns O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):242-57. PubMed ID: 16494684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching.
    Pettigrew C; Martin RC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; 69(12):2431-2451. PubMed ID: 26594895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developmental trajectories in toddlers' self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: a behavioral genetic analysis.
    Friedman NP; Miyake A; Robinson JL; Hewitt JK
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Sep; 47(5):1410-30. PubMed ID: 21668099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in mixing costs relate to general executive functioning.
    Smith LL; Banich MT; Friedman NP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):606-613. PubMed ID: 29985039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in musical training and executive functions: A latent variable approach.
    Okada BM; Slevc LR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1076-1092. PubMed ID: 29752659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stochastic Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Stability and Flexibility.
    Ueltzhöffer K; Armbruster-Genç DJ; Fiebach CJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 11(6):e1004331. PubMed ID: 26068119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibit, switch, and update: A within-subject fMRI investigation of executive control.
    Lemire-Rodger S; Lam J; Viviano JD; Stevens WD; Spreng RN; Turner GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107134. PubMed ID: 31299188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context-specific activations are a hallmark of the neural basis of individual differences in general executive function.
    Reineberg AE; Banich MT; Wager TD; Friedman NP
    Neuroimage; 2022 Apr; 249():118845. PubMed ID: 34963651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.