BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24792657)

  • 1. Approach to breast magnetic resonance imaging interpretation.
    Palestrant S; Comstock CE; Moy L
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):563-83. PubMed ID: 24792657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast magnetic resonance imaging: management of an enhancing focus.
    Ha R; Comstock CE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 24792658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to optimize clinical breast MR imaging practices and techniques on Your 1.5-T system.
    Rausch DR; Hendrick RE
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 16973776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.
    Weinstein S; Rosen M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimized density-weighted imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR mammography.
    Gutberlet M; Roth A; Hahn D; Köstler H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21274974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.
    Kuhl C
    Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):356-78. PubMed ID: 17641361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BI-RADS® 3 lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: is an initial short-interval follow-up necessary?
    Bahrs SD; Baur A; Hattermann V; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Siegmann-Luz KC
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Apr; 55(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 23969262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of a dedicated 1.5-T breast MR imaging system.
    Hillman BJ; Harms SE; Stevens G; Stough RG; Hollingsworth AB; Kozlowski KF; Moss LJ
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22923716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
    Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.
    Molleran V; Mahoney MC
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):171-85, vii. PubMed ID: 20494304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast imaging: is the sonographic descriptor of orientation valid for magnetic resonance imaging?
    Oliveira TM; Brasileiro Sant'Anna TK; Mauad FM; Elias J; Muglia VF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22911937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An overview of interpretation strategies for breast MR imaging.
    Schnall MD
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):289-94, v-vi. PubMed ID: 11493419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of MR imaging screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with lobular carcinoma in situ.
    Friedlander LC; Roth SO; Gavenonis SC
    Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 21900618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast magnetic resonance imaging interpretation using computer-aided detection.
    Comstock C
    Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 21134531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast imaging. Picturing the latest breast cancer detection methods.
    Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2006 May; 10(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16585920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controversies in breast MRI.
    Sutcliffe JB; Otto PM
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2013; 42(4):149-63. PubMed ID: 23795994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical aspects of breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hylton NM; Kinkel K
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Feb; 9(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9617899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.