These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24792660)

  • 1. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Jochelson M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):609-16. PubMed ID: 24792660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging.
    Lewin J
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2018 May; 26(2):259-263. PubMed ID: 29622130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts.
    Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Lewin JM; Niklason L
    Semin Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 42(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 17919527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Adler G; Garbay JR; Delaloge S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18790584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
    Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
    Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013.
    Badr S; Laurent N; Régis C; Boulanger L; Lemaille S; Poncelet E
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Mar; 95(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 24238816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
    Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography: A Single-Institution Experience of the First 208 Cases.
    Lewis TC; Pizzitola VJ; Giurescu ME; Eversman WG; Lorans R; Robinson KA; Patel BK
    Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 27696576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls.
    Polat DS; Evans WP; Dogan BE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1267-1278. PubMed ID: 32877247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [CONTRAST ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN WOMEN WITH INTERMEDIATE BREAST CANCER RISK AND DENSE BREAST].
    Sklair-Levy M; Sorin V; Yagil Y; Shalmon A; Halshtok Neiman O; Samoocha D; Faermann Weidenfeld R
    Harefuah; 2022 Feb; 161(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 35195969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brief communication: The current status of contrast-enhanced mammography in breast imaging.
    Savaria D; Kaushik C
    Clin Imaging; 2024 Sep; 113():110213. PubMed ID: 38852214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.