These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24793117)
1. Effects of the intensity of masking noise on ear canal recorded low-frequency cochlear microphonic waveforms in normal hearing subjects. Zhang M Hear Res; 2014 Jul; 313():9-17. PubMed ID: 24793117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using a concha electrode to measure response patterns based on the amplitudes of cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal-hearing subjects. Zhang M Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25083598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects. Zhang M Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 22696071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials]. Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms. Zhang M Audiol Res; 2013 Jan; 3(1):e3. PubMed ID: 26557341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations. Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using concha electrodes to measure cochlear microphonic waveforms and auditory brainstem responses. Zhang M Trends Amplif; 2010 Dec; 14(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 21131635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Place-specific derived cochlear microphonics from human ears. Ponton CW; Don M; Eggermont JJ Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):131-41. PubMed ID: 1439498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear distribution of frequency-following response initiation. A high-pass masking noise study. Yamada O; Kodera K; Hink RF; Suzuki JI Audiology; 1979; 18(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 496720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of cochlear microphonics in infants and young children with auditory neuropathy. Shi W; Ji F; Lan L; Liang SC; Ding HN; Wang H; Li N; Li Q; Li XQ; Wang QJ Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 132(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 22103337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noise-induced changes in cochlear compression in the rat as indexed by forward masking of the auditory brainstem response. Bielefeld EC; Hoglund EM; Feth LL Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):64-72. PubMed ID: 23123219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of cochlear microphonics in clinical electrocochleography. Kumagami H; Miyazaki M ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1987; 49(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 3601376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear initiation sites of the frequency following potential. McDermott JC Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 6612218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs. Boothalingam S; Lineton B Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the cochlear microphonic to a low-frequency tone embedded in filtered noise. Chertoff ME; Earl BR; Diaz FJ; Sorensen JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3351-62. PubMed ID: 23145616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time and frequency metrics related to auditory masking of a 10 kHz tone in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Branstetter BK; Trickey JS; Aihara H; Finneran JJ; Liberman TR J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4556. PubMed ID: 25669265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():3-14. PubMed ID: 2110797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]