319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24794761)
1. The combined effects of undersized drilling and implant macrogeometry on bone healing around dental implants: an experimental study.
Jimbo R; Tovar N; Anchieta RB; Machado LS; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Coelho PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1269-75. PubMed ID: 24794761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of drilling dimension on implant placement torque and early osseointegration stages: an experimental study in dogs.
Campos FE; Gomes JB; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Suzuki M; Witek L; Zanetta-Barbosa D; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):e43-50. PubMed ID: 22182660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of a modified cutting flute implant design on osseointegration.
Jimbo R; Tovar N; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Anchieta RB; Silveira LM; Janal MN; Shibli JA; Coelho PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):883-8. PubMed ID: 24583140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different drilling preparation on cortical bone: A biomechanical, histological, and micro-CT study on sheep.
Stocchero M; Toia M; Jinno Y; Cecchinato F; Becktor JP; Naito Y; Halldin A; Jimbo R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):707-715. PubMed ID: 29781224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 23638908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of undersized drilling on implant biomechanical stability at early implantation times.
Coelho PG; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Campos FE; Gomes JB; Guastaldi F; Anchieta RB; Silveira L; Bonfante EA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e69-75. PubMed ID: 23351770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Osteotomy Dimension on Implant Insertion Torque, Healing Mode, and Osseointegration Indicators: A Study in Dogs.
Marin C; Bonfante E; Granato R; Neiva R; Gil LF; Marão HF; Suzuki M; Coelho PG
Implant Dent; 2016 Dec; 25(6):739-743. PubMed ID: 27513163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simplified drilling technique does not decrease dental implant osseointegration: a preliminary report.
Jimbo R; Giro G; Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Tovar N; Lilin T; Janal M; Coelho PG
J Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 84(11):1599-605. PubMed ID: 23215672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible.
Trisi P; Todisco M; Consolo U; Travaglini D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):837-49. PubMed ID: 21841994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: a prospective clinical study.
Alghamdi H; Anand PS; Anil S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):e506-12. PubMed ID: 22117707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of drilling speed on early bone healing to oral implants.
Yeniyol S; Jimbo R; Marin C; Tovar N; Janal MN; Coelho PG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 24055149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of drilling technique on the early integration of plateau root form endosteal implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Giro G; Marin C; Granato R; Bonfante EA; Suzuki M; Janal MN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2158-63. PubMed ID: 21530048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone particles and the undersized surgical technique.
Tabassum A; Walboomers XF; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
J Dent Res; 2010 Jun; 89(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 20212102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological evaluation of oral implants inserted with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; de Ruijter AJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 17517059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of surface contamination on osseointegration of dental implants surrounded by circumferential bone defects.
Mohamed S; Polyzois I; Renvert S; Claffey N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 20443803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of different surgical drilling procedures on full laser-etched microgrooves surface-treated implants: an experimental study in sheep.
Jimbo R; Tovar N; Yoo DY; Janal MN; Anchieta RB; Coelho PG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1072-7. PubMed ID: 23772753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of underpreparation on primary stability of implants inserted in poor quality bone sites: an in vitro study.
Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1084-8. PubMed ID: 25861691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of endosseous implants at early implantation times: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Granato R; Marin C; Bonfante EA; Freire JN; Janal MN; Gil JN; Suzuki M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1667-75. PubMed ID: 20561471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone-implant interface around titanium implants under different loading conditions: a histomorphometrical analysis in the Macaca fascicularis monkey.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Wicht H; Yacoob H; Nentwig GH
J Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 74(10):1483-90. PubMed ID: 14653395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
