282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24795170)
1. Real-time polymerase chain reaction correlates well with clinical diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Berry N; Sewell B; Jafri S; Puli C; Vagia S; Lewis AM; Davies D; Rees E; Ch'ng CL
J Hosp Infect; 2014 Jun; 87(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 24795170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction and an enzyme immunoassay with toxigenic culture in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated infections.
Hernández-Rocha C; Barra-Carrasco J; Álvarez-Lobos M; Paredes-Sabja D; Guzmán-Durán AM
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2013 Apr; 75(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 23415540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
Bamber AI; Fitzsimmons K; Cunniffe JG; Beasor CC; Mackintosh CA; Hobbs G
Br J Biomed Sci; 2012; 69(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 23057158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of
Senok AC; Aldosari KM; Alowaisheq RA; Abid OA; Alsuhaibani KA; Khan MA; Somily AM
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2017; 23(4):259-262. PubMed ID: 28721981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Goldenberg SD; Cliff PR; Smith S; Milner M; French GL
J Hosp Infect; 2010 Jan; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19900734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.
Landry ML; Topal JE; Estis J; Katzenbach P; Nolan N; Sandlund J
J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 31776192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Reller ME; Lema CA; Perl TM; Cai M; Ross TL; Speck KA; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 45(11):3601-5. PubMed ID: 17804652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical relevance of a positive molecular test in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Baker I; Leeming JP; Reynolds R; Ibrahim I; Darley E
J Hosp Infect; 2013 Aug; 84(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 23831282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clostridium difficile infection diagnosis in a paediatric population: comparison of methodologies.
Hart J; Putsathit P; Knight DR; Sammels L; Riley TV; Keil A
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Sep; 33(9):1555-64. PubMed ID: 24781004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clostridium difficile infection diagnostics - evaluation of the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete assay, a rapid enzyme immunoassay for detection of toxigenic C. difficile in clinical stool samples.
Johansson K; Karlsson H; Norén T
APMIS; 2016 Nov; 124(11):1016-1020. PubMed ID: 27651167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Neuendorf M; Guadarrama-Gonzalez R; Lamik B; MacKenzie CR
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 16():19. PubMed ID: 26868647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Simplexa universal direct PCR with cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: performance, cost, and correlation with disease.
Landry ML; Ferguson D; Topal J
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 52(1):275-80. PubMed ID: 24226924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Diagnostic Algorithm for the Detection of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea.
Yoldaş Ö; Altındiş M; Cufalı D; Aşık G; Keşli R
Balkan Med J; 2016 Jan; 33(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 26966622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of laboratory tests for detection for Clostridioides difficile: A multicenter prospective study in Japan.
Senoh M; Kato H; Honda H; Fukuda T; Tagashira Y; Horiuchi H; Chiba H; Suzuki D; Hosokawa N; Kitazono H; Norisue Y; Kume H; Mori N; Morikawa H; Kashiwagura S; Higuchi A; Kato H; Nakamura M; Ishiguro S; Morita S; Ishikawa H; Watanabe T; Kojima K; Yokomaku I; Bando T; Toimoto K; Moriya K; Kasahara K; Kitada S; Ogawa J; Saito H; Tominaga H; Shimizu Y; Masumoto F; Tadera K; Yoshida J; Kikuchi T; Yoshikawa I; Watanabe T; Honda M; Yokote K; Toyokawa T; Miyazato H; Nakama M; Mahe C; Reske K; Olsen MA; Dubberke ER
Anaerobe; 2019 Dec; 60():102107. PubMed ID: 31647977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detection of Clostridium difficile in the stool samples of patients with suspected Clostridium difficile Infection: a meta-analysis.
Deshpande A; Pasupuleti V; Rolston DD; Jain A; Deshpande N; Pant C; Hernandez AV
Clin Infect Dis; 2011 Oct; 53(7):e81-90. PubMed ID: 21890762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture.
Jensen MB; Olsen KE; Nielsen XC; Hoegh AM; Dessau RB; Atlung T; Engberg J
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Apr; 34(4):727-36. PubMed ID: 25421216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile.
Shin BM; Lee EJ; Moon JW; Lee SY
Anaerobe; 2016 Aug; 40():68-72. PubMed ID: 27282799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces of Asymptomatic Patients Admitted to the Hospital.
Terveer EM; Crobach MJ; Sanders IM; Vos MC; Verduin CM; Kuijper EJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 55(2):403-411. PubMed ID: 27852676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-time polymerase chain reaction testing for Clostridium difficile reduces isolation time and improves patient management in a small community hospital.
Catanzaro M; Cirone J
Am J Infect Control; 2012 Sep; 40(7):663-6. PubMed ID: 22153847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between the two-step and the three-step algorithms for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Qutub MO; AlBaz N; Hawken P; Anoos A
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2011; 29(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 21860113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
