These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24795441)

  • 1. 'Why should I care?' Challenging free will attenuates neural reaction to errors.
    Rigoni D; Pourtois G; Brass M
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 10(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 24795441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When errors do not matter: weakening belief in intentional control impairs cognitive reaction to errors.
    Rigoni D; Wilquin H; Brass M; Burle B
    Cognition; 2013 May; 127(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 23466640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inducing disbelief in free will alters brain correlates of preconscious motor preparation: the brain minds whether we believe in free will or not.
    Rigoni D; Kühn S; Sartori G; Brass M
    Psychol Sci; 2011 May; 22(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 21515737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced error-related negativity on flanker errors: error expectancy or error significance?
    Maier ME; di Pellegrino G; Steinhauser M
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Jul; 49(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 22524281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Common mechanisms in error monitoring and action effect monitoring.
    Steinhauser R; Wirth R; Kunde W; Janczyk M; Steinhauser M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1159-1171. PubMed ID: 30069791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do we make mistakes? Neurocognitive processes during the preparation-perception-action cycle and error-detection.
    Perri RL; Berchicci M; Lucci G; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():320-8. PubMed ID: 25812715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.
    de Bruijn ER; Miedl SF; Bekkering H
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):397-404. PubMed ID: 21424844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
    Tanaka H
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anxiety not only increases, but also alters early error-monitoring functions.
    Aarts K; Pourtois G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 10(4):479-92. PubMed ID: 21098809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error detection and behavioural inhibition in young heavy drinkers.
    Smith JL; Mattick RP; Sufani C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2017 Feb; 171():20-30. PubMed ID: 28012428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Losing the error related negativity in the EEG of human subjects: an indicator for willed action.
    Stemmer B; Witzke W; Schönle PW
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Jul; 308(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 11445286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial cueing modulates the monitoring of correct responses.
    Hoffmann S; Wascher E
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Jan; 506(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 22108568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speeded response errors and the error-related negativity modulate early sensory processing.
    Beatty PJ; Buzzell GA; Roberts DM; McDonald CG
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():112-120. PubMed ID: 30096369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance monitoring, error processing, and evaluative control following severe TBI.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Schmalfuss IM; Perlstein WM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Nov; 13(6):961-71. PubMed ID: 17942014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting errors from patterns of event-related potentials preceding an overt response.
    Bode S; Stahl J
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 103():357-69. PubMed ID: 25450163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance monitoring mechanisms activated before and after a response: A comparison of aware and unaware errors.
    Hoonakker M; Doignon-Camus N; Bonnefond A
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():53-60. PubMed ID: 27568326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An unnecessary response is detected faster than an insufficient response.
    Murata A; Katayama J
    Neuroreport; 2005 Sep; 16(14):1595-8. PubMed ID: 16148752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance monitoring and response conflict resolution associated with choice stepping reaction tasks.
    Watanabe T; Tsutou K; Saito K; Ishida K; Tanabe S; Nojima I
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3355-3365. PubMed ID: 27443854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action monitoring in motor control: ERPs following selection and execution errors in a force production task.
    de Bruijn ER; Hulstijn W; Meulenbroek RG; Van Galen GP
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Sep; 40(5):786-95. PubMed ID: 14696732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive error processing distinguishes between relevant and irrelevant errors after visuomotor learning.
    Maurer LK; Joch M; Hegele M; Maurer H; Müller H
    J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):18. PubMed ID: 30995682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.