125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24795940)
1. Can the "turn-of-the-nut" method improve cortical screw fixation?
Thakkar SC; Langdale ER; Mears SC; Belkoff SM
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Apr; 28(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24795940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does maximum torque mean optimal pullout strength of screws?
Tankard SE; Mears SC; Marsland D; Langdale ER; Belkoff SM
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Apr; 27(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 23114416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screw insertion in osteoporotic bone: turn-of-the-nut and torque-based techniques provide similar resistance to bone plate slippage.
Mears SC; Langdale ER; Belkoff SM
J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Feb; 29(2):e65-8. PubMed ID: 24869757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical evaluation of a 4-mm cancellous "rescue" screw in osteoporotic cortical bone: a cadaveric study.
Wall SJ; Soin SP; Knight TA; Mears SC; Belkoff SM
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):379-82. PubMed ID: 20502222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.
Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Turner JL; Crandall DG; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 23602373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Insertion torque and pullout force of rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation in a fatigued initial pilot hole.
Pitzen T; Franta F; Barbier D; Steudel WI
J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 15347006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of cemented rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation.
Pitzen TR; Drumm J; Bruchmann B; Barbier DD; Steudel WI
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Jan; 4(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16506467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical measurements of cortical screw purchase in five types of human and artificial humeri.
Aziz MS; Nicayenzi B; Crookshank MC; Bougherara H; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():159-67. PubMed ID: 24295967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Fixation Properties of the Cortical Bone Trajectory in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Gao H; Jia CY; Xing T; Zhang JX; Dong FL; Shen CL
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e717-e727. PubMed ID: 30092463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of screw insertion angle and thread type on the pullout strength of bone screws in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models.
Patel PS; Shepherd DE; Hukins DW
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Oct; 32(8):822-8. PubMed ID: 20558097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of screw insertion torque and pullout strength.
Ricci WM; Tornetta P; Petteys T; Gerlach D; Cartner J; Walker Z; Russell TA
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20502221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws.
Ryken TC; Clausen JD; Traynelis VC; Goel VK
J Neurosurg; 1995 Aug; 83(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 7616279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.
Bullmann V; Schmoelz W; Richter M; Grathwohl C; Schulte TL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E932-9. PubMed ID: 20508553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout.
Karami KJ; Buckenmeyer LE; Kiapour AM; Kelkar PS; Goel VK; Demetropoulos CK; Soo TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E133-9. PubMed ID: 25310387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical Investigation of a Novel Revision Device in an Osteoporotic Model: Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Anchor Versus Larger Screw Diameter.
Manon J; Hussain MM; Harris J; Moldavsky M; La Marca F; Bucklen BS
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):265-271. PubMed ID: 28632549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
