These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24796247)

  • 1. Pitfalls in the experimental recording of ultrasonic (backscatter) polar scans for material characterization.
    Kersemans M; Van Paepegem W; Van Den Abeele K; Pyl L; Zastavnik F; Sol H; Degrieck J
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Aug; 54(6):1509-21. PubMed ID: 24796247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quasi-harmonic ultrasonic polar scan for material characterization: experiment and numerical modeling.
    Kersemans M; Martens A; Van Den Abeele K; Degrieck J; Pyl L; Zastavnik F; Sol H; Van Paepegem W
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():111-22. PubMed ID: 25620710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic polar scans: numerical simulation on generally anisotropic media.
    Declercq NF; Degrieck J; Leroy O
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 45(1-4):32-9. PubMed ID: 16831454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the influence of fatigue on ultrasonic polar scans of fiber reinforced composites.
    Declercq NF; Degrieck J; Leroy O
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):173-7. PubMed ID: 15047282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of ultrasonic C-scan image in acoustically homogeneous and layered anisotropic materials using three dimensional ray tracing method.
    Kolkoori S; Hoehne C; Prager J; Rethmeier M; Kreutzbruck M
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):551-62. PubMed ID: 24008174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasonic characterization of granites obtained from industrial quarries of Extremadura (Spain).
    del Río LM; López F; Esteban FJ; Tejado JJ; Mota M; González I; San Emeterio JL; Ramos A
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e1057-61. PubMed ID: 16814343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing System of Semi-Enclosed Workpiece with Dual-Robot Testing System.
    Guo C; Xu C; Hao J; Xiao D; Yang W
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 31370173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffuse ultrasonic backscatter at normal incidence through a curved interface.
    Ghoshal G; Turner JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3449-58. PubMed ID: 21218878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring predictability in ultrasonic signals: an application to scattering material characterization.
    Carrión A; Miralles R; Lara G
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Sep; 54(7):1904-11. PubMed ID: 24952468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasonic field profile evaluation in acoustically inhomogeneous anisotropic materials using 2D ray tracing model: Numerical and experimental comparison.
    Kolkoori SR; Rahman MU; Chinta PK; Ktreutzbruck M; Rethmeier M; Prager J
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Feb; 53(2):396-411. PubMed ID: 22963829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional simulation of the single-sided air-coupled ultrasonic pitch-catch technique for non-destructive testing.
    Delrue S; Van Den Abeele K; Blomme E; Deveugele J; Lust P; Matar OB
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 19732929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mode-converted diffuse ultrasonic backscatter.
    Hu P; Kube CM; Koester LW; Turner JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):982-90. PubMed ID: 23927097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between experimental and 2-D numerical studies of multiple scattering in Inconel600 by means of array probes.
    Shahjahan S; Rupin F; Aubry A; Chassignole B; Fouquet T; Derode A
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):358-67. PubMed ID: 23880120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dependence of diffuse ultrasonic backscatter on residual stress in 1080 steel.
    Du H; Turner JA
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Apr; 67():65-69. PubMed ID: 26784273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional hybrid model for predicting air-coupled generation of guided waves in composite material plates.
    Masmoudi M; Castaings M
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 21782203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of double scattering in diffuse ultrasonic backscatter measurements.
    Hu P; Turner JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):321-34. PubMed ID: 25618063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic characterization of delamination in aeronautical composites using noncontact laser generation and detection.
    Sun G; Zhou Z; Chen X; Wang J
    Appl Opt; 2013 Sep; 52(26):6481-6. PubMed ID: 24085123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grain Scattering Noise Modeling and Its Use in the Detection and Characterization of Defects Using Ultrasonic Arrays.
    Bai L; Velichko A; Drinkwater BW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Nov; 66(11):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 31283480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasonic imaging algorithms with limited transmission cycles for rapid nondestructive evaluation.
    Moreau L; Drinkwater BW; Wilcox PD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Sep; 56(9):1932-44. PubMed ID: 19811996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation-based imaging technique using ultrasonic transmit-receive array for Non-Destructive Evaluation.
    Quaegebeur N; Masson P
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Dec; 52(8):1056-64. PubMed ID: 23017439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.