These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24796923)
1. Biological instability in a chlorinated drinking water distribution network. Nescerecka A; Rubulis J; Vital M; Juhna T; Hammes F PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96354. PubMed ID: 24796923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying the underlying causes of biological instability in a full-scale drinking water supply system. Nescerecka A; Juhna T; Hammes F Water Res; 2018 May; 135():11-21. PubMed ID: 29448079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-Term Bacterial Dynamics in a Full-Scale Drinking Water Distribution System. Prest EI; Weissbrodt DG; Hammes F; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164445. PubMed ID: 27792739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flow cytometric bacterial cell counts challenge conventional heterotrophic plate counts for routine microbiological drinking water monitoring. Van Nevel S; Koetzsch S; Proctor CR; Besmer MD; Prest EI; Vrouwenvelder JS; Knezev A; Boon N; Hammes F Water Res; 2017 Apr; 113():191-206. PubMed ID: 28214393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A microbiology-based multi-parametric approach towards assessing biological stability in drinking water distribution networks. Lautenschlager K; Hwang C; Liu WT; Boon N; Köster O; Vrouwenvelder H; Egli T; Hammes F Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(9):3015-25. PubMed ID: 23557697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing microbiological water quality in drinking water distribution systems with disinfectant residual using flow cytometry. Gillespie S; Lipphaus P; Green J; Parsons S; Weir P; Juskowiak K; Jefferson B; Jarvis P; Nocker A Water Res; 2014 Nov; 65():224-34. PubMed ID: 25123436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow cytometry total cell counts: a field study assessing microbiological water quality and growth in unchlorinated drinking water distribution systems. Liu G; Van der Mark EJ; Verberk JQ; Van Dijk JC Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():595872. PubMed ID: 23819117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seawater desalination based drinking water: Microbial characterization during distribution with and without residual chlorine. Farhat N; Kim L; Mineta K; Alarawi M; Gojobori T; Saikaly P; Vrouwenvelder J Water Res; 2022 Feb; 210():117975. PubMed ID: 34952456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining flow cytometry and 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing: a promising approach for drinking water monitoring and characterization. Prest EI; El-Chakhtoura J; Hammes F; Saikaly PE; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():179-89. PubMed ID: 25000200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of biofilm cell quantification methods for drinking water distribution systems. Waller SA; Packman AI; Hausner M J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():8-21. PubMed ID: 29111400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flow-cytometric total bacterial cell counts as a descriptive microbiological parameter for drinking water treatment processes. Hammes F; Berney M; Wang Y; Vital M; Köster O; Egli T Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17659762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamics of bacterial communities before and after distribution in a full-scale drinking water network. El-Chakhtoura J; Prest E; Saikaly P; van Loosdrecht M; Hammes F; Vrouwenvelder H Water Res; 2015 May; 74():180-90. PubMed ID: 25732558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring microbiological changes in drinking water systems using a fast and reproducible flow cytometric method. Prest EI; Hammes F; Kötzsch S; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(19):7131-42. PubMed ID: 24183559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-time ArcGIS and heterotrophic plate count based chloramine disinfectant control in water distribution system. Bai X; Zhi X; Zhu H; Meng M; Zhang M Water Res; 2015 Jan; 68():812-20. PubMed ID: 25466639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the suitability of online flow cytometry for monitoring full-scale drinking water ozone system disinfection effectiveness. Dowdell KS; Olsen K; Martinez Paz EF; Sun A; Keown J; Lahr R; Steglitz B; Busch A; LiPuma JJ; Olson T; Raskin L Water Res; 2024 Jun; 257():121702. PubMed ID: 38749337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid, cultivation-independent assessment of microbial viability in drinking water. Berney M; Vital M; Hülshoff I; Weilenmann HU; Egli T; Hammes F Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):4010-8. PubMed ID: 18694583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introducing bacterial community turnover times to elucidate temporal and spatial hotspots of biological instability in a large Austrian drinking water distribution network. Campostrini L; Proksch P; Jakwerth S; Farnleitner AH; Kirschner AKT Water Res; 2024 Mar; 252():121188. PubMed ID: 38324987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow cytometry for immediate follow-up of drinking water networks after maintenance. Van Nevel S; Buysschaert B; De Roy K; De Gusseme B; Clement L; Boon N Water Res; 2017 Mar; 111():66-73. PubMed ID: 28043001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system. Putri RE; Kim LH; Farhat N; Felemban M; Saikaly PE; Vrouwenvelder JS PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253799. PubMed ID: 34166448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing flow cytometry with culture-based methods for microbial monitoring and as a diagnostic tool for assessing drinking water treatment processes. Cheswick R; Cartmell E; Lee S; Upton A; Weir P; Moore G; Nocker A; Jefferson B; Jarvis P Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104893. PubMed ID: 31226555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]