These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24796953)

  • 1. Limitations and recommendations for successful DNA extraction from forensic soil samples: a review.
    Young JM; Rawlence NJ; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 24796953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic soil DNA analysis using high-throughput sequencing: a comparison of four molecular markers.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():176-84. PubMed ID: 25151602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the origin of soil evidence: High throughput eukaryote sequencing and MIR spectroscopy applied to a crime scene scenario.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Breen J; Macdonald LM; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jun; 251():22-31. PubMed ID: 25839677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validation of forensic DNA extraction systems to utilize soil contaminated biological evidence.
    Kasu M; Shires K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 25690910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soil DNA metabarcoding and high-throughput sequencing as a forensic tool: considerations, potential limitations and recommendations.
    Young JM; Austin JJ; Weyrich LS
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2017 Feb; 93(2):. PubMed ID: 27979996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbial DNA profiling by multiplex terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism for forensic comparison of soil and the influence of sample condition.
    Macdonald LM; Singh BK; Thomas N; Brewer MJ; Campbell CD; Dawson LA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 105(3):813-21. PubMed ID: 18429978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Residual soil DNA extraction increases the discriminatory power between samples.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Clarke LJ; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2015 Jun; 11(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 25722081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Massively parallel sequencing is unlocking the potential of environmental trace evidence.
    Young JM; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102393. PubMed ID: 33157385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-throughput Sequencing of Trace Quantities of Soil Provides Reproducible and Discriminative Fungal DNA Profiles.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):478-484. PubMed ID: 27404621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-laboratory evaluation of the ISO standard 11063 "Soil quality - Method to directly extract DNA from soil samples".
    Petric I; Philippot L; Abbate C; Bispo A; Chesnot T; Hallin S; Laval K; Lebeau T; Lemanceau P; Leyval C; Lindström K; Pandard P; Romero E; Sarr A; Schloter M; Simonet P; Smalla K; Wilke BM; Martin-Laurent F
    J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Mar; 84(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 21256879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioinformatics Approach to Assess the Biogeographical Patterns of Soil Communities: The Utility for Soil Provenance.
    Damaso N; Mendel J; Mendoza M; von Wettberg EJ; Narasimhan G; Mills D
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1033-1042. PubMed ID: 29357400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial metagenome profiling using amplicon length heterogeneity-polymerase chain reaction proves more effective than elemental analysis in discriminating soil specimens.
    Moreno LI; Mills DK; Entry J; Sautter RT; Mathee K
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1315-22. PubMed ID: 17199616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semi-automated genetic analyses of soil microbial communities: comparison of T-RFLP and RISA based on descriptive and discriminative statistical approaches.
    Hartmann M; Frey B; Kölliker R; Widmer F
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Jun; 61(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 15767011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraction of human DNA for PCR from chewed residues of betel quid using a novel "PVP/CTAB" method.
    Chiou FS; Pai CY; Hsu YP; Tsai CW; Yang CH
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Sep; 46(5):1174-9. PubMed ID: 11569562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbial soil community analyses for forensic science: Application to a blind test.
    Demanèche S; Schauser L; Dawson L; Franqueville L; Simonet P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():153-158. PubMed ID: 27984802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental discrimination and molecular characterization of the extracellular soil DNA fraction.
    Ceccherini MT; Ascher J; Agnelli A; Borgogni F; Pantani OL; Pietramellara G
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2009 Nov; 96(4):653-7. PubMed ID: 19533410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Particle size analysis of soils under simulated scene of crime conditions: the interest of multivariate analyses.
    Chazottes V; Brocard C; Peyrot B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Mar; 140(2-3):159-66. PubMed ID: 15036437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of an effective method of human DNA extraction from soil as forensic evidence.
    Hirashima H; Hisazumi R; Mason MLT; Yamamoto A; Saeki Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jun; 335():111284. PubMed ID: 35398634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA extraction from soil by EZ1 advanced XL (Qiagen).
    Barbaro A; Cormaci P; La Marca A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jun; 299():161-167. PubMed ID: 31022675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AutoMate Express™ forensic DNA extraction system for the extraction of genomic DNA from biological samples.
    Liu JY; Zhong C; Holt A; Lagace R; Harrold M; Dixon AB; Brevnov MG; Shewale JG; Hennessy LK
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1022-30. PubMed ID: 22390771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.