BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24797320)

  • 1. Response to letter to the editor by Dr Wages et al.
    Hirakawa A; Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(12):2159-60. PubMed ID: 24797320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on 'A dose-finding approach based on shrunken predictive probability for combinations of two agents in phase I trials' by Akihiro Hirakawa, Chikuma Hamada, and Shigeyuki Matsui.
    Wages NA; Conaway MR; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(12):2156-8. PubMed ID: 24797319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dose-finding approach based on shrunken predictive probability for combinations of two agents in phase I trials.
    Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4515-25. PubMed ID: 23650098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control.
    Tighiouart M; Rogatko A; Babb JS
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2183-96. PubMed ID: 15909291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2.
    Guo W; Wang SJ; Yang S; Lynn H; Ji Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Jul; 58():23-33. PubMed ID: 28458054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An optimization algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials.
    Jiang H; Liu Y; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 17681867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. np1: a computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials.
    Kramar A; Houédé N; Paoletti X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 17719124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.
    Gönen M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 15837436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior maximization and averaging for Bayesian working model choice in the continual reassessment method.
    Daimon T; Zohar S; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1563-73. PubMed ID: 21351288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early phase dose finding methodology.
    Iasonos A; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):201-203. PubMed ID: 27921353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choice of designs and doses for early phase trials.
    Zhou Y
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 18(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 15147290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
    Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A default method to specify skeletons for Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials.
    Pan H; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):266-279. PubMed ID: 26991076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian decision procedures for dose-escalation based on evidence of undesirable events and therapeutic benefit.
    Whitehead J; Zhou Y; Stevens J; Blakey G; Price J; Leadbetter J
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 16342336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
    Paoletti X; Kramar A
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
    Wang Y; Ivanova A
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-dimensional dose finding in discrete dose space.
    Wang K; Ivanova A
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 15737096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response to comments on 'competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials' by G. Yin, R. Lin and N. Wages.
    Riviere MK; Dubois F; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 25492617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A two-stage algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials for two new molecular entities.
    Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):105-7. PubMed ID: 19879974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the continual reassessment method to a phase I dose-finding trial in Japanese patients: East meets West.
    Morita S
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2090-7. PubMed ID: 21500239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.