128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24797567)
1. Contribution of nonimplanted ear to pitch perception for prelingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Tung TH; Li LP
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1409-14. PubMed ID: 24797567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Hsieh JC; Tung TH; Li LP
Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.
Mok M; Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e359-e368. PubMed ID: 28678079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic properties of vocal singing in prelingually-deafened children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.
Mao Y; Zhang M; Nutter H; Zhang Y; Zhou Q; Liu Q; Wu W; Xie D; Xu L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Nov; 77(11):1833-40. PubMed ID: 24035642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.
Bond M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Elston J; Weiner G; Taylor RS; Hoyle M; Liu Z; Price A; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(44):1-330. PubMed ID: 19799825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aids.
Looi V; Radford CJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 21300411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit from bimodal hearing in a group of prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users.
Berrettini S; Passetti S; Giannarelli M; Forli F
Am J Otolaryngol; 2010; 31(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 20015774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandarin lexical tones identification among children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.
Li A; Wang N; Li J; Zhang J; Liu Z
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 78(11):1945-52. PubMed ID: 25234731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between tone perception and production in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Zhou N; Huang J; Chen X; Xu L
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):499-506. PubMed ID: 23442566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted prelingually deafened adults: changes in quality of life.
Straatman LV; Huinck WJ; Langereis MC; Snik AF; Mulder JJ
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 24448285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Music and Speech Perception in Prelingually Deafened Young Listeners With Cochlear Implants: A Preliminary Study Using Sung Speech.
Wheeler HJ; Hatch DR; Moody-Antonio SA; Nie Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):3951-3965. PubMed ID: 36179251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tripolar Stimulation Improves Polyphonic Pitch Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Chari DA; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 30531636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users].
Wang S; Dong RJ; Li J; Zhou Y; Qi BE; Chen XQ; Liu B
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audio-visual integration during speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children revealed by the McGurk effect.
Tona R; Naito Y; Moroto S; Yamamoto R; Fujiwara K; Yamazaki H; Shinohara S; Kikuchi M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2072-8. PubMed ID: 26455920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance Plateau in Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Cusumano C; Friedmann DR; Fang Y; Wang B; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):334-338. PubMed ID: 28166183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
Morita T; Naito Y; Hirai T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
