These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24797942)
1. The effect of age on complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy. Turner LC; Kantartzis K; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 24797942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: The effect of age on complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy. Griebling TL J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1314-5. PubMed ID: 25890533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of prior prolapse repairs on surgical outcomes with minimally invasive sacral colpopexy. Dubinskaya A; Bradley MS; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2061-2067. PubMed ID: 32130464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus. Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to a fellowship training program. Kantartzis K; Sutkin G; Winger D; Wang L; Shepherd J Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1877-81. PubMed ID: 23549650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Age on Perioperative Complications After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy. Edge P; Barletta K; Patnam R; Geller EJ Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):351-355. PubMed ID: 32265403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications and Prolapse Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy. Turner L; Lavelle E; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 27054791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Time of Year on Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension. Renkosiak K; Bradley M; Dubinskaya A; Shepherd JP Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Sep; 28(9):561-566. PubMed ID: 35649240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure. Hanes CR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy. Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy. Panico G; Campagna G; Vacca L; Caramazza D; Iannone V; Rossitto C; Rumolo V; Scambia G; Ercoli A Minerva Med; 2021 Aug; 112(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 32272829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of postoperative acute urinary retention in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy. Turner LC; Kantartzis K; Shepherd JP Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25185611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adverse outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women 65 years and older in the United States. Bretschneider CE; Scales CD; Osazuwa-Peters O; Sheyn D; Sung V Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Sep; 33(9):2409-2418. PubMed ID: 35662357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical outcomes of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy related to body mass index. McDermott CD; Park J; Terry CL; Woodman PJ; Hale DS J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Jan; 34(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 22260763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications following vaginal colpopexy for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Bretschneider CE; Sheyn D; Mahajan S; Propst K; Ridgeway B Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):993-999. PubMed ID: 32940729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-, peri- and postoperative complications in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in geriatric women. Körnig M; Brühlmann E; Günthert A; Christmann C Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 May; 224():142-145. PubMed ID: 29605709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of corneal abrasions during pelvic reconstructive surgery. Antosh DD; Whyte T; Ezzell A; Chen BA; Sokol AI; Park AJ Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Feb; 166(2):226-8. PubMed ID: 23265300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]