These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24798642)

  • 21. Assessment of heifer grazing experience on short-term adaptation to pasture and performance as lactating cows.
    Lopes F; Coblentz W; Hoffman PC; Combs DK
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3138-52. PubMed ID: 23522679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Questionnaire investigation to clarify the occurrence rate and characteristics of maternal rejection behavior in Japanese black cattle (Bos taurus).
    Kohari D; Takakura A
    Anim Sci J; 2017 Dec; 88(12):2071-2076. PubMed ID: 28799182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preference for spatial cues in a non-storing songbird species.
    Hodgson ZG; Healy SD
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Jul; 8(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 15611879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Responses of dairy heifers to the visual cliff formed by a herringbone milking pit: evidence of fear of heights in cows (Bos taurus).
    Arnold NA; Ng KT; Jongman EC; Hemsworth PH
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Nov; 121(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 18085928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Capuchin monkeys (Cebus nigritus) use spatial and visual information during within-patch foraging.
    Gomes DF; Bicca-Marques JC
    Am J Primatol; 2012 Jan; 74(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 21969135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The detection and avoidance of lead-contaminated herbage by dairy cows.
    Strojan ST; Phillips CJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Nov; 85(11):3045-53. PubMed ID: 12487470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experience with featural-cue reliability influences featural- and geometric-cue use by mice (Mus musculus).
    Leonard K; Tian N; Ivanco TL; Kelly DM
    J Comp Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132(1):106-114. PubMed ID: 29283589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Older and wiser? Age differences in foraging and learning by an endangered passerine.
    Franks VR; Thorogood R
    Behav Processes; 2018 Mar; 148():1-9. PubMed ID: 29273549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exclusion in corvids: the performance of food-caching Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius).
    Shaw RC; Plotnik JM; Clayton NS
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 Nov; 127(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 23668696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predator and heterospecific stimuli alter behaviour in cattle.
    Kluever BM; Howery LD; Breck SW; Bergman DL
    Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 19429201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of embryonic light stimulation on the ability to discriminate left from right in the domestic chick.
    Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(1):240-6. PubMed ID: 19059286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of providing total mixed rations indoors and on pasture on the behavior of lactating dairy cattle and their preference to be indoors or on pasture.
    Charlton GL; Rutter SM; East M; Sinclair LA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):3875-84. PubMed ID: 21787924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of frequency of feeding a total mixed ration on the production and behavior of dairy cows.
    Phillips CJ; Rind MI
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Sep; 84(9):1979-87. PubMed ID: 11573777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment.
    Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of feed bunk competition on the feed sorting behavior of close-up dry cows.
    Hosseinkhani A; Devries TJ; Proudfoot KL; Valizadeh R; Veira DM; von Keyserlingk MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Mar; 91(3):1115-21. PubMed ID: 18292267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Working for food you don't desire. Cues interfere with goal-directed food-seeking.
    Watson P; Wiers RW; Hommel B; de Wit S
    Appetite; 2014 Aug; 79():139-48. PubMed ID: 24743030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of subthalamic nucleus lesions on sign-tracking to stimuli paired with food and drug rewards: facilitation of incentive salience attribution?
    Uslaner JM; Dell'Orco JM; Pevzner A; Robinson TE
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Sep; 33(10):2352-61. PubMed ID: 18059435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pregnancy rate following GnRH + PGF 2alpha treatment of low body condition, anestrous Bos taurus by Bos indicus crossbred cows during the summer months in a tropical environment.
    Ahuja C; Montiel F; Canseco R; Silva E; Mapes G
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Jul; 87(3-4):203-13. PubMed ID: 15911171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Honeybees learn the sign and magnitude of reward variations.
    Gil M; De Marco RJ
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Sep; 212(17):2830-4. PubMed ID: 19684218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enhanced c-Fos expression in superior colliculus, paraventricular thalamus and septum during learning of cue-reward association.
    Igelstrom KM; Herbison AE; Hyland BI
    Neuroscience; 2010 Jul; 168(3):706-14. PubMed ID: 20399252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.