205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24799118)
1. Methods and preliminary findings of a cost-effectiveness study of glass-ionomer-based and composite resin sealant materials after 2 yr.
Goldman AS; Chen X; Fan M; Frencken JE
Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 122(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 24799118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness, in a randomized trial, of glass-ionomer-based and resin sealant materials after 4 yr.
Goldman AS; Chen X; Fan M; Frencken JE
Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Oct; 124(5):472-479. PubMed ID: 27666137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.
Chen X; Du MQ; Fan MW; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study.
Gorseta K; Glavina D; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Van Duinen RN; Skrinjaric I; Hill RG; Lynch E
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
Beiruti N; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; van Palenstein Helderman WH
Caries Res; 2006; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do light cured ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants perform better than resin-composite sealants: a 4-year randomized clinical trial.
Zhang W; Chen X; Fan MW; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2014 May; 30(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 24602520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT.
Chen X; Cuijpers V; Fan M; Frencken JE
J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 20580767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glass ionomer ART sealants in Chinese school children-6-year results.
Holmgren CJ; Lo EC; Hu D
J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):764-70. PubMed ID: 23831419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years.
Zhang W; Chen X; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017; 15(4):307-314. PubMed ID: 28752157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treating High-Caries Risk Occlusal Surfaces in First Permanent Molars through Sealants and Supervised Toothbrushing: A 3-Year Cost-Effective Analysis.
Goldman A; Leal SC; de Amorim RG; Frencken JE
Caries Res; 2017; 51(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 28954261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up].
Liu YJ; Chang Q; Rong WS; Zhao XL
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature.
Simonsen RJ
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):393-414. PubMed ID: 12412954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants.
Oba AA; Dülgergil T; Sönmez IS; Doğan S
J Formos Med Assoc; 2009 Nov; 108(11):844-8. PubMed ID: 19933027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant.
Smales RJ; Lee YK; Lo FW; Tse CC; Chung MS
Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 9545905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can Glass ionomer sealants be cost-effective?
Kervanto-Seppälä S; Lavonius E; Kerosuo E; Pietilä I
J Clin Dent; 2000; 11(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11460286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant.
Beresescu L; Kovacs M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Benedek C; Pop M; Bungardean D; Eșian D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial.
Forss H; Saarni UM; Seppä L
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years.
Chen X; Du M; Fan M; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct; 16(5):1443-50. PubMed ID: 22124610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.
Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146512. PubMed ID: 26799812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study.
Mejàre I; Mjör IA
Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug; 98(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 2144660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
