These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24800415)

  • 1. Multisensory encoding improves auditory recognition.
    Moran ZD; Bachman P; Pham P; Cho SH; Cannon TD; Shams L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(6):581-92. PubMed ID: 24800415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiovisual semantic congruency during encoding enhances memory performance.
    Heikkilä J; Alho K; Hyvönen H; Tiippana K
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 25384643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination.
    Lehmann S; Murray MM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 15993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories.
    Thelen A; Murray MM
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(5):483-502. PubMed ID: 24649531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning.
    Thelen A; Cappe C; Murray MM
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1478-88. PubMed ID: 22609795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does multisensory study benefit memory for pictures and sounds?
    Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    Cognition; 2022 Sep; 226():105181. PubMed ID: 35640373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination.
    Thelen A; Talsma D; Murray MM
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():148-60. PubMed ID: 25743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experience and information loss in auditory and visual memory.
    Gloede ME; Paulauskas EE; Gregg MK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1344-1352. PubMed ID: 27118246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection task.
    Peiffer AM; Mozolic JL; Hugenschmidt CE; Laurienti PJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(10):1077-81. PubMed ID: 17558300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multisensory perspective on object memory.
    Matusz PJ; Wallace MT; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Oct; 105():243-252. PubMed ID: 28400327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of modality and repetition in a continuous recognition memory task: Repetition has no effect on auditory recognition memory.
    Amir Kassim A; Rehman R; Price JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():72-80. PubMed ID: 29407247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual discrimination.
    Marks LE; Ben-Artzi E; Lakatos S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):125-45. PubMed ID: 14511841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Active learning of novel sound-producing objects: motor reactivation and enhancement of visuo-motor connectivity.
    Butler AJ; James KH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 25(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 22905816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The informativity of sound modulates crossmodal facilitation of visual discrimination: a fMRI study.
    Li Q; Yu H; Li X; Sun H; Yang J; Li C
    Neuroreport; 2017 Jan; 28(2):63-68. PubMed ID: 27926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Aversive Learning Compromises Sensory Discrimination.
    Shalev L; Paz R; Avidan G
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(11):2766-2779. PubMed ID: 29439168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory capture of visual motion: effects on perception and discrimination.
    McCourt ME; Leone LM
    Neuroreport; 2016 Sep; 27(14):1095-100. PubMed ID: 27513197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When audition dominates vision: evidence from cross-modal statistical learning.
    Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 23047918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latency of modality-specific reactivation of auditory and visual information during episodic memory retrieval.
    Ueno D; Masumoto K; Sutani K; Iwaki S
    Neuroreport; 2015 Apr; 26(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 25756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic auditory disambiguation of visual awareness.
    Plass J; Guzman-Martinez E; Ortega L; Suzuki S; Grabowecky M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2055-2063. PubMed ID: 28634962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantically Congruent Sounds Facilitate the Decoding of Degraded Images.
    Lu L; Zhang G; Xu J; Liu B
    Neuroscience; 2018 May; 377():12-25. PubMed ID: 29408368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.