126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24801511)
1. Comparative analysis of two femtosecond LASIK platforms using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics.
D'Souza S; Petznick A; Tong L; Hall RC; Rosman M; Chan C; Koh SK; Beuerman RW; Zhou L; Mehta JS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(6):3396-402. PubMed ID: 24801511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
Liu YC; Yam GH; Lin MT; Teo E; Koh SK; Deng L; Zhou L; Tong L; Mehta JS
J Adv Res; 2021 Mar; 29():67-81. PubMed ID: 33842006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye parameters after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.
Huang JC; Sun CC; Chang CK; Ma DH; Lin YF
J Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 28(9):625-31. PubMed ID: 22947290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.
Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES
J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dry eyes and corneal sensation after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser flap creation Effect of hinge position, hinge angle, and flap thickness.
Mian SI; Li AY; Dutta S; Musch DC; Shtein RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2092-8. PubMed ID: 19969213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of thin femtosecond LASIK flaps on corneal sensitivity and tear function.
Barequet IS; Hirsh A; Levinger S
J Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 24(9):897-902. PubMed ID: 19044230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx(®) flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis.
Vestergaard A; Ivarsen A; Asp S; Hjortdal JØ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 22512839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser platforms in contralateral eyes.
Rosman M; Hall RC; Chan C; Ang A; Koh J; Htoon HM; Tan DT; Mehta JS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1066-73. PubMed ID: 23680627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dry eye after LASIK with a femtosecond laser or a mechanical microkeratome.
Sun CC; Chang CK; Ma DH; Lin YF; Chen KJ; Sun MH; Hsiao CH; Wu PH
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 90(10):1048-56. PubMed ID: 23912969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tear menisci after laser in situ keratomileusis with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser.
Xie W; Zhang D; Chen J; Liu J; Yu Y; Hu L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Aug; 55(9):5806-12. PubMed ID: 25146992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
He L; Liu A; Manche EE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nerve growth factor concentration and implications in photorefractive keratectomy vs laser in situ keratomileusis.
Lee HK; Lee KS; Kim HC; Lee SH; Kim EK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 139(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 15953424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optical Zone Centration Accuracy Using Corneal Fixation-based SMILE Compared to Eye Tracker-based Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.
Reinstein DZ; Gobbe M; Gobbe L; Archer TJ; Carp GI
J Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 31(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 26352563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal sensation after corneal refractive surgery with small incision lenticule extraction.
Demirok A; Ozgurhan EB; Agca A; Kara N; Bozkurt E; Cankaya KI; Yilmaz OF
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 90(10):1040-7. PubMed ID: 23939296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for flap creation in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.
Yu CQ; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(4):740-8. PubMed ID: 25840298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual outcomes comparison of 2 femtosecond laser platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Ang M; Mehta JS; Rosman M; Li L; Koh JC; Htoon HM; Tan D; Chan C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1647-52. PubMed ID: 24054977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of dry-eye disease severity after laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Dooley I; D'Arcy F; O'Keefe M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):1058-64. PubMed ID: 22624906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of tear osmolarity and other dry eye parameters in post-LASIK eyes.
Hassan Z; Szalai E; Berta A; Modis L; Nemeth G
Cornea; 2013 Jul; 32(7):e142-5. PubMed ID: 23665645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
