91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24802069)
1. Classification of dynamic contrast enhanced MR images of cervical cancers using texture analysis and support vector machines.
Torheim T; Malinen E; Kvaal K; Lyng H; Indahl UG; Andersen EK; Futsaether CM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1648-56. PubMed ID: 24802069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of cervical cancers predict chemoradiotherapy outcome.
Andersen EK; Hole KH; Lund KV; Sundfør K; Kristensen GB; Lyng H; Malinen E
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Apr; 107(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 23333024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective staging of fibrosis by the selected texture features of liver: Which one is better, CT or MR imaging?
Zhang X; Gao X; Liu BJ; Ma K; Yan W; Liling L; Yuhong H; Fujita H
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():227-36. PubMed ID: 26455963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI using pharmacokinetic model and 3-D morphology analysis.
Wang TC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chen JH; Huang GY; Chang YC; Chang RF
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 32(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 24439361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of cervical cancers: temporal percentile screening of contrast enhancement identifies parameters for prediction of chemoradioresistance.
Andersen EK; Hole KH; Lund KV; Sundfør K; Kristensen GB; Lyng H; Malinen E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e485-92. PubMed ID: 22014954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cluster analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI reveals tumor subregions related to locoregional relapse for cervical cancer patients.
Torheim T; Groendahl AR; Andersen EK; Lyng H; Malinen E; Kvaal K; Futsaether CM
Acta Oncol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):1294-1298. PubMed ID: 27564398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI texture analysis for pretreatment prediction of clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
Teruel JR; Heldahl MG; Goa PE; Pickles M; Lundgren S; Bathen TF; Gibbs P
NMR Biomed; 2014 Aug; 27(8):887-96. PubMed ID: 24840393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic knee cartilage segmentation from multi-contrast MR images using support vector machine classification with spatial dependencies.
Zhang K; Lu W; Marziliano P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Dec; 31(10):1731-43. PubMed ID: 23867282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data of locally advanced cervical carcinoma with the Brix model.
Lund KV; Simonsen TG; Kristensen GB; Rofstad EK
Acta Oncol; 2019 Jun; 58(6):828-837. PubMed ID: 30810443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification: a phantom study.
Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Berg A; Materka A; Dirisamer A; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19465863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of contrast-enhanced MRI derived textural features to predict overall survival in locally advanced breast cancer.
Chronaiou I; Giskeødegård GF; Goa PE; Teruel J; Hedayati R; Lundgren S; Huuse EM; Pickles MD; Gibbs P; Sitter B; Bathen TF
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):875-884. PubMed ID: 31744303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated MR image classification in temporal lobe epilepsy.
Focke NK; Yogarajah M; Symms MR; Gruber O; Paulus W; Duncan JS
Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):356-62. PubMed ID: 21835245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D lacunarity in multifractal analysis of breast tumor lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Soares F; Janela F; Pereira M; Seabra J; Freire MM
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Nov; 22(11):4422-35. PubMed ID: 24057004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements predict radiation response in cervix cancer.
Zahra MA; Tan LT; Priest AN; Graves MJ; Arends M; Crawford RA; Brenton JD; Lomas DJ; Sala E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(3):766-73. PubMed ID: 19019563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic fractal signature dissimilarity analysis for therapeutic response assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Wang C; Subashi E; Yin FF; Chang Z
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1335-47. PubMed ID: 26936718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography correlates with 3-dimensional fluorescence ultramicroscopy in antiangiogenic therapy of breast cancer xenografts.
Pöschinger T; Renner A; Eisa F; Dobosz M; Strobel S; Weber TG; Brauweiler R; Kalender WA; Scheuer W
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):445-56. PubMed ID: 24598441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data.
Twellmann T; Lichte O; Nattkemper TW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16229413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated characterization of breast lesions imaged with an ultrafast DCE-MR protocol.
Platel B; Mus R; Welte T; Karssemeijer N; Mann R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Feb; 33(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 24058020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nominated texture based cervical cancer classification.
Mariarputham EJ; Stephen A
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():586928. PubMed ID: 25649913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
