258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24802187)
1. Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.
Schmidt U; Temerinac D; Bildstein K; Tuschy B; Mayer J; Sütterlin M; Siemer J; Kehl S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():153-6. PubMed ID: 24802187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different sonographic methods to determine fetal abdominal circumference.
Kehl S; Zaiss I; Freiburg F; Speierer A; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 28(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 20881366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New sonographic method for fetuses with small abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21630187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study.
Kehl S; Schmidt U; Spaich S; Schild RL; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 21898638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.
Papageorghiou AT; Kemp B; Stones W; Ohuma EO; Kennedy SH; Purwar M; Salomon LJ; Altman DG; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Pang R; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Jaffer YA; Victora CG; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):719-726. PubMed ID: 26924421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study.
Napolitano R; Donadono V; Ohuma EO; Knight CL; Wanyonyi SZ; Kemp B; Norris T; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 48(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 27158767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do specific weight formulas for fetuses < or = 1500 g really improve weight estimation?
Hoopmann M; Bernau B; Hart N; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Feb; 31(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 20091464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses Siemer J; Hilbert A; Hart N; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation.
Faschingbauer F; Dammer U; Raabe E; Schneider M; Faschingbauer C; Schmid M; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Kehl S; Mayr A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):805-11. PubMed ID: 25870017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three sonographic circumference measurement techniques to predict birth weight.
Smulian JC; Ranzini AC; Ananth CV; Rosenberg JC; Vintzileos AM
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 93(5 Pt 1):692-6. PubMed ID: 10912969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic estimation of fetal head circumference: how accurate are we?
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Danon D; Mashiach R; Meizner I; Ben-Haroush A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 20661958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancy in ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) in breech presented fetuses.
Lubusky M; Prochazka M; Langova M; Vomackova K; Cizek L
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2007 Dec; 151(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 18345272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated fetal head detection and measurement in ultrasound images by iterative randomized Hough transform.
Lu W; Tan J; Floyd R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 31(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 15972198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
