330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24802202)
1. Uterus preserving vaginal surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse.
Iliev VN; Andonova IT
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 24802202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication.
de Boer TA; Milani AL; Kluivers KB; Withagen MI; Vierhout ME
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1313-9. PubMed ID: 19669686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effectiveness of vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse].
Shen WJ; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Duan L; Zhang YH; Niu K; Wang WY; Qin L; Zhang XL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 54(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 31006188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for prevention of vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy.
Pal M; Bandyopadhyay S
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):633-637. PubMed ID: 29777272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The modified Manchester Fothergill procedure compared with vaginal hysterectomy with low uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: long-term outcome.
Enklaar RA; Knapen FMFM; Schulten SFM; van Osch LADM; van Leijsen SAL; Gondrie ETCM; Weemhoff M
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 35652948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Rosen ER; Swenson CW; Fenner DE; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 27858132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High uterosacral ligament suspension in radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure to prevent pelvic organ prolapse.
Cai L; Qu X; Xu L; Cao J; Li D
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Nov; 34(11):2839-2842. PubMed ID: 37417994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: an activity-based costing analysis.
Husby KR; Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1161-1171. PubMed ID: 29480429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.
Hwang WY; Jeon MJ; Suh DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 May; 31(5):406-413. PubMed ID: 38336010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.
Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):28-34. PubMed ID: 29673691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament.
Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
