330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24802202)
21. Manchester Operation: An Effective Treatment for Uterine Prolapse Caused by True Cervical Elongation.
Park YJ; Kong MK; Lee J; Kim EH; Bai SW
Yonsei Med J; 2019 Nov; 60(11):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31637890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A commentary on "The modified Manchester Fothergill procedure compared with vaginal hysterectomy with low uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: long term outcome".
Chill HH
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):165. PubMed ID: 35657396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Forde JC; Chughtai B; Anger JT; Mao J; Sedrakyan A
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1183-1195. PubMed ID: 28091710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cervical amputation versus vaginal hysterectomy: a population-based register study.
Bergman I; Söderberg MW; Kjaeldgaard A; Ek M
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 27530518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term outcomes of modified high uterosacral ligament vault suspension (HUSLS) at vaginal hysterectomy.
Doumouchtsis SK; Khunda A; Jeffery ST; Franco AV; Fynes MM
Int Urogynecol J; 2011 May; 22(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 21125218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality of life following vaginal reconstructive versus obliterative surgery for treating advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
Petcharopas A; Wongtra-Ngan S; Chinthakanan O
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 29379997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality of life and sexuality after bilateral sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse.
Yalcin Y; Demir Caltekin M; Eris Yalcin S
Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2020 Sep; 12(3):206-210. PubMed ID: 32003546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.
Pedersen KD; Storkholm MH; Bek KM; Glavind-Kristensen M; Greisen S
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31299946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
Chill HH; Cohen-Milun G; Cohen A; Moss NP; Winer JD; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):784-790. PubMed ID: 35283321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
Chill HH; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Cohen A; Dick A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Uterus preserving surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine descent: a systematic review].
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Vierhout ME; van Eijndhoven HW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(42):A3623. PubMed ID: 22027462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Women's well-being after Manchester procedure for pelvic reconstruction with uterine preservation: a follow-up study.
Liebergall-Wischnitzer M; Ben-Meir A; Sarid O; Cwikel J; Lavy Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1587-92. PubMed ID: 22210295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fixation of uterosacral ligaments to anterior vaginal wall during modified McCall culdoplasty after vaginal hysterectomy.
Mancarella M; Testa F; Chiadò Piat F; Novara L; Biglia N; Sgro LG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():221-226. PubMed ID: 35114574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension: An alternative to McCall culdoplasty in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Novara L; Sgro LG; Pecchio S; Ottino L; Tomatis V; Biglia N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():278-281. PubMed ID: 31351324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse.
Wang Q; Wu N; Li Y; Lin C; Xu Y; Chen X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Apr; 49(4):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 36734101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Should a hysterectomy be carried at the same time as surgery for a prolapse by vaginal route?].
Debodinance P; Fatton B; Lucot JP
Prog Urol; 2009 Dec; 19(13):1060-73. PubMed ID: 19969277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]