562 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24802305)
1. Ex vivo and in vivo assessment of the non-linearity of elasticity properties of breast tissues for quantitative strain elastography.
Umemoto T; Ueno E; Matsumura T; Yamakawa M; Bando H; Mitake T; Shiina T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1755-68. PubMed ID: 24802305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel fast full inversion based breast ultrasound elastography technique.
Karimi H; Fenster A; Samani A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2219-33. PubMed ID: 23475227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pattern classification of ShearWave™ Elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses.
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1069-75. PubMed ID: 22013011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.
Tanter M; Bercoff J; Athanasiou A; Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Montaldo G; Muller M; Tardivon A; Fink M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1373-86. PubMed ID: 18395961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation.
Kim S; Choi S; Choi Y; Kook SH; Park HJ; Chung EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1797-804. PubMed ID: 25253826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Similar Reproducibility for Strain and Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Mass Evaluation: A Prospective Study Using the Same Ultrasound System.
Zhang L; Dong YJ; Zhou JQ; Jia XH; Li S; Zhan WW
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 46(4):981-991. PubMed ID: 31980291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software.
Balleyguier C; Canale S; Ben Hassen W; Vielh P; Bayou EH; Mathieu MC; Uzan C; Bourgier C; Dromain C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 22445593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of tomosynthesis elastography in a breast-mimicking phantom.
Engelken FJ; Sack I; Klatt D; Fischer T; Fallenberg EM; Bick U; Diekmann F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2169-73. PubMed ID: 21724357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strain Elastography of Breast and Prostata Cancer: Similarities and Differences.
Daniaux M; Auer T; De Zordo T; Junker D; Santner W; Hubalek M; Jaschke W; Aigner F
Rofo; 2016 Mar; 188(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 26529265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Dong F; Wu H; Zhang L; Tian H; Liang W; Ye X; Liu Y; Xu J
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2181-2190. PubMed ID: 30593673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shear Wave Elastography Imaging for the Features of Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: A Feasibility Study.
Lou Z; Yang J; Tang L; Jin Y; Zhang J; Liu C; Li Q
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1213-1223. PubMed ID: 28218798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of the Elasticity of Breast Tissue during the Menstrual Cycle Using Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography.
Li X; Wang JN; Fan ZY; Kang S; Liu YJ; Zhang YX; Wang XM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 41(12):3140-7. PubMed ID: 26403697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shear-wave elastographic features of breast cancers: comparison with mechanical elasticity and histopathologic characteristics.
Lee SH; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM; Moon HG; Han W; Noh DY; Lee JC; Kim HC; Lee KB; Park IA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 24169069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch tissue quantification: measurements of normal breast tissue and dependence on the degree of pre-compression.
Wojcinski S; Brandhorst K; Sadigh G; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2226-32. PubMed ID: 24035624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
