122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24802619)
1. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Di Benedetto A; Soares R; Dovey Z; Bott S; McGregor RG; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2015 May; 115(5):780-6. PubMed ID: 24802619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum 5-year follow-up of 1138 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.
Soares R; Di Benedetto A; Dovey Z; Bott S; McGregor RG; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):546-53. PubMed ID: 25098710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The learning curve for laparoscopic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: implications for compliance with existing guidelines.
Eden CG; Zacharakis E; Bott S
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 23419154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cancer control, continence, and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy beyond the learning and discovery curves.
Eden CG; Arora A; Hutton A
J Endourol; 2011 May; 25(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 21510804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.
Tse E; Knaus R
Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.
Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple 'learning curves'.
Eden CG; Neill MG; Louie-Johnsun MW
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1224-30. PubMed ID: 19021612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on clinical T3 prostate cancer: experience of a single centre with long-term follow-up.
Gözen AS; Akin Y; Ates M; Hruza M; Rassweiler J
BJU Int; 2015 Jul; 116(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 24571244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extended vs standard pelvic lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Eden CG; Arora A; Rouse P
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 20132202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: an apparently safe and effective procedure.
Brown JA; Garlitz C; Strup SE; Hubosky SG; Gomella L
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2004 Dec; 14(6):335-8. PubMed ID: 15684777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with preoperative PSA >20 ng/ml undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Zugor V; Witt JH; Heidenreich A; Porres D; Labanaris AP
Anticancer Res; 2012 May; 32(5):2091-5. PubMed ID: 22593494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
