These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24803429)

  • 1. Communicating Relative Risk Changes with Baseline Risk: Presentation Format and Numeracy Matter.
    Bodemer N; Meder B; Gigerenzer G
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):615-26. PubMed ID: 24803429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial.
    Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 21768582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Best Methods of Communicating Clinical Trial Data to Improve Understanding of Treatments for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
    Reen GK; Silber E; Langdon DW
    Value Health; 2018 Jul; 21(7):762-766. PubMed ID: 30005747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data.
    Sheridan SL; Pignone M
    Eff Clin Pract; 2002; 5(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11874195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehension of Internet-based numeric cancer information by older adults.
    Donelle L; Hoffman-Goetz L; Gatobu S; Arocha JF
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Dec; 34(4):209-24. PubMed ID: 19919298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health numeracy and understanding of risk among older American Indians and Alaska Natives.
    LaVallie DL; Wolf FM; Jacobsen C; Sprague D; Buchwald DS
    J Health Commun; 2012; 17(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 22188207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numbers matter to informed patient choices: a randomized design across age and numeracy levels.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):430-42. PubMed ID: 24246563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.
    Miron-Shatz T; Hanoch Y; Graef D; Sagi M
    J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 19657924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experienced Probabilities Increase Understanding of Diagnostic Test Results in Younger and Older Adults.
    Armstrong B; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Aug; 37(6):670-679. PubMed ID: 28199179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.
    Fagerlin A; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Jankovic A; Derry HA; Smith DM
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 17641137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website.
    Gardner PH; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Knapp P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 21621949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can I Count on Getting Better? Association between Math Anxiety and Poorer Understanding of Medical Risk Reductions.
    Rolison JJ; Morsanyi K; O'Connor PA
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Oct; 36(7):876-86. PubMed ID: 26296620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strengths and Gaps in Physicians' Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication.
    Petrova D; Kostopoulou O; Delaney BC; Cokely ET; Garcia-Retamero R
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):355-365. PubMed ID: 28884617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Guiding Toward Task-Relevant Information Help Improve Graph Processing and Graph Comprehension of Individuals with Low or High Numeracy? An Eye-Tracker Experiment.
    Keller C; Junghans A
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Nov; 37(8):942-954. PubMed ID: 28618918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Separate Single-Outcome Risk Presentations Instead of Integrated Multioutcome Formats Improves Comprehension in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Wallace MJ; Weissler EH; Yang JC; Brotzman L; Corriere MA; Secemsky EA; Sutphin J; Johnson FR; Marcos Gonzalez J; Tarver ME; Saha A; Chen AL; Gebben DJ; Malone M; Farb A; Babalola O; Rorer EM; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Reed SD
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Aug; 44(6):649-660. PubMed ID: 38903012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial.
    Sinayev A; Peters E; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):937-47. PubMed ID: 25952743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].
    Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Apr; 70(7):1019-25. PubMed ID: 20116159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comprehension and choice of a consumer-directed health plan: an experimental study.
    Greene J; Peters E; Mertz CK; Hibbard JH
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Jun; 14(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 18554075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.